Madurai order student data
Follow:
- Next story The real question was whether the final penalty order had been passed within the time limit set out in Section 275 of the Income Tax Act. At a preliminary stage, the court found that the order appeared to have been issued after the prescribed limitation and stayed recovery of the penalty.
- Previous story The Madras High Court ruled that a student who attains benchmark disability of 40 percent during the course of study is entitled to tuition fee waiver, notwithstanding the fact that the student was not admitted under the PwD quota at the time of admission.
Recent Posts
- Acter case
- BEFORE THE HON’BLE CITY CIVIL COURT AT CHENNAI O.S. No. of 2026 Dr.S.Ramadass,
- Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai is hereby set aside and the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands allowed. No costs. [N.A.V, J.] & [K.K.R.K, J.] 15.04.2026
- Order setaside THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 13561 of 2022 AND WMP NO. 12759 OF 2022,WMP NO. 12760 OF 2022, WMP NO. 12761 OF 2022 Delphina Consultants LLP, Represented by its designated partner Mr. Y. Meera Reddy
- Temple Standing For Over 50 Years In Layout Park Cannot Be Treated As Encroachment; Is Part And Parcel Of Park: Madras High Court The Court dismissed the writ petition with a cost of Rs.1lakh, observing that the petition appeared to be filed with malafide intent to incite communal unrest. CASEDETAILS Case Title Jesudass Cornelius v. The District Collector, Thiruvallur District & Ors. Case No. WP No.1200 of 2022 Bench Justice Krishnan Ramasamy Date of Order 04 March 2026 Result Petition Dismissed with Costs Petition Dismissed with Rs.1 lakh cost
More
Recent Posts
- Acter case
- BEFORE THE HON’BLE CITY CIVIL COURT AT CHENNAI O.S. No. of 2026 Dr.S.Ramadass,
- Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai is hereby set aside and the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands allowed. No costs. [N.A.V, J.] & [K.K.R.K, J.] 15.04.2026
- Order setaside THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 13561 of 2022 AND WMP NO. 12759 OF 2022,WMP NO. 12760 OF 2022, WMP NO. 12761 OF 2022 Delphina Consultants LLP, Represented by its designated partner Mr. Y. Meera Reddy
- Temple Standing For Over 50 Years In Layout Park Cannot Be Treated As Encroachment; Is Part And Parcel Of Park: Madras High Court The Court dismissed the writ petition with a cost of Rs.1lakh, observing that the petition appeared to be filed with malafide intent to incite communal unrest. CASEDETAILS Case Title Jesudass Cornelius v. The District Collector, Thiruvallur District & Ors. Case No. WP No.1200 of 2022 Bench Justice Krishnan Ramasamy Date of Order 04 March 2026 Result Petition Dismissed with Costs Petition Dismissed with Rs.1 lakh cost