Justice N Senthilkumar of #MadrasHighCourt dismisses applications filed by popular chef Madhampatty T Rangaraj to restrain costume designer Joy Crizildaa from defaming him.

by Sekar Reporter · January 7, 2026

Justice N Senthilkumar of #MadrasHighCourt
dismisses applications filed by popular chef Madhampatty T Rangaraj to restrain costume designer Joy Crizildaa from defaming him. @THChennai Backgrounder 👇

Share this post:

Share on X (Twitter) Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on Email

You may also like...

• 

  NOTIFICATION NO. 3 OF 2023 It is hereby notified for the general information of the public that the Bar Council of Tamilnadu and Puducherry had passed prohibitory order

  January 28, 2023

   by Sekar Reporter · Published January 28, 2023

• 

  [1/8, 14:48] Sekarreporter: A Bench headed by Chief Justice S.A. Bobde accepted the CBI’s status report and allowed two officers to be relieved from the investigation team The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Wednesday told the Supreme Court that there was no evidence of the murder of children in the Muzaffarpur shelter home. The probe agency told the apex court that two skeletons were recovered, but forensic investigation later revealed it to be that of a woman and a man. [1/8, 14:48] Sekarreporter: A Bench headed by Chief Justice S.A. Bobde accepted the CBI’s status report and allowed two officers to be relieved from the investigation team. Attorney General K.K. Venugopal, appearing for the probe agency, said an investigation was done on the rape and sexual assault allegation of children and charge sheets had been filed before the concerned courts. Mr. Venugopal said the children, who were alleged to be murdered, were later traced and found to be alive. He said the CBI had investigated 17 shelter homes in Bihar and charge sheets had been filed in 13 of them. In four cases, a preliminary inquiry was conducted and later closed as no evidence was found.

  January 8, 2020

   by Sekar Reporter · Published January 8, 2020

• 

  BREAKING: — #JanaNayagan Censor Update The writ appeal has been accepted. The earlier order passed by the single judge has been cancelled. The court said the single judge should have given time to the other side to file their reply. So, the case is being sent back to the same single judge to hear it again. The producer is also allowed to change or add to his request in the writ petition. MEANING : – The higher court agreed with the appeal. – The earlier decision is no longer valid. – The case is not finished yet; it will be heard again from the beginning. – The producer gets another chance to modify what he is asking from the court.

  January 27, 2026

   by Sekar Reporter · Published January 27, 2026