Justice M Dhandapani of Madras HC granted advance bail to 4 co-accused in cases booked against self-styled godman Sivashankaran @ Siva Shankar Baba accused of sexually abusing girl children of a residential school on the outskirts of Chennai @THChennai https://t.co/V2yMP2pA8n

by Sekar Reporter · July 6, 2021

Justice M Dhandapani of Madras HC granted advance bail to 4 co-accused in cases booked against self-styled godman Sivashankaran @ Siva Shankar Baba accused of sexually abusing girl children of a residential school on the outskirts of Chennai @THChennai
https://t.co/V2yMP2pA8n

Share this post:

Share on X (Twitter) Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on Email

You may also like...

• 

  this Court is of the considered viewthat the age of superannuation as prescribed under regulation 2.12 is binding on the third respondent University and any other prescription of age of superannuation repugnant to the AICTE regulation is to be held void and inoperative and it cannot be enforced in law. THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN W.P. Nos.17918 and 17929 of 2021 W.P.No.17918 of 2021

  April 12, 2022

   by Sekar Reporter · Published April 12, 2022

• 

  Ragubathy Former Hc Judge: Thamil Vaalga and Thamilagam Vaalga. The Oath taking ceremony will be under the total control of the office of the Governor. The Chief Secretary as per the protocol commenced and concluded the ceremony only after getting the approval of the Governor.The Governor himself may have to adopt the procedure as per the notification issued. Vandemadharam , Natonal anthem

  May 11, 2026

   by Sekar Reporter · Published May 11, 2026

• 

  HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.31934 of 2014 C.Jagadeesan           …Petitioner. In view of the facts and circumstances, the period of absence was regularized by the competent authority, the punishment of dismissal from service is untenable and consequently the order impugned passed by the second respondent in proceedings No.Tha.Pa.3/2012 dated 07.11.2012 and the appellate order passed by the first respondent in proceedings C.No.A2/PR No.3/Appeal/2012 dated 23.01.2013 are hereby quashed. The respondents are directed to reinstate the writ petitioner in service without backwages but with continuity of service. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Bala   for M/s.G.Bala and Daisy For Respondents : Mrs.S.Anitha Special Government Pleader ORDER The order of dismissal from service which was confirmed by the .

  August 8, 2022

   by Sekar Reporter · Published August 8, 2022