Judges mm Sundaresh Hemalatha j order news in Puthiyathaimurai TV video attached here
![Justice CV Karthikeyan has allowed application filed by MAM Trust and imposed a cost of Rs.1 lakh on MRC. The cost is to be paid to Rajiv Gandhi Govt General Hospital for treatment of COVID-19 patients. [11/23, 16:34] Sekarreporter 1: CS.737/2019 – Dr.M.A.M.RamaswamyChettiarof](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story Mhc advocate. m.Radakrishnan interview regarding obc
- Previous story சேலம் எட்டு வழிச்சாலை வழக்கை உச்சநீதிமன்றம் ஆகஸ்டு 6ஆம் தேதிக்கு ஒத்திவைத்துள்ளது
Recent Posts
- HON’BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER WA No. 1952 of 2022 AND CMP NO. 14254 OF 2022 Power Grid Corporation of India Limited Registered Office at B-9, Qutab Institutiional Area, katwaria Sarai, New Delhi-110 016. ..Appellant
- HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.(MD)No.11386 of 2026 Tamil Rajendiran @ R.Rajendiran .. Petitioner vs. 1.The Principal Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, No.119, Uthamar Gandhi Road, Chennai-600 034. 3.The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Madurai. 4.The Joint Commissioner/Executive Officer, Arulmigu Meenakshi Sundareswarar Temple,
- HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI W.P.Crl.(MD)No.2270 of 2026 V.Malar … Petitioner Vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police, O/o/ Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.
- HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN R.T.(MD).No.02 of 2026 and Crl.A.(MD).No.425 of 2026 R.T.(MD).No.02 of 2026: The State of Tamilnadu rep by, The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Valliyoor,
- In the present case, the scope of Section 41(1) of the Act read with Rule 25 of the Rules is crystal clear and therefore, the scope of exercising discretionary power by the High Court in condoning the delay beyond the period contemplated for preferring any appeal under the Act does not arise at all. 14. In view of the above legal position, the objection raised by the Registry is sustained and the S.T.A.SR.No.81961 of 2019 is rejected at the SR stage. Registry is directed to upload this order in the High Court web site and to report the same under neutral citation. (S.M.S.,J.) (K.S.,J.) 16-04-2026
More
Recent Posts
- HON’BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER WA No. 1952 of 2022 AND CMP NO. 14254 OF 2022 Power Grid Corporation of India Limited Registered Office at B-9, Qutab Institutiional Area, katwaria Sarai, New Delhi-110 016. ..Appellant
- HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.(MD)No.11386 of 2026 Tamil Rajendiran @ R.Rajendiran .. Petitioner vs. 1.The Principal Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, No.119, Uthamar Gandhi Road, Chennai-600 034. 3.The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Madurai. 4.The Joint Commissioner/Executive Officer, Arulmigu Meenakshi Sundareswarar Temple,
- HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI W.P.Crl.(MD)No.2270 of 2026 V.Malar … Petitioner Vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police, O/o/ Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.
- HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN R.T.(MD).No.02 of 2026 and Crl.A.(MD).No.425 of 2026 R.T.(MD).No.02 of 2026: The State of Tamilnadu rep by, The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Valliyoor,
- In the present case, the scope of Section 41(1) of the Act read with Rule 25 of the Rules is crystal clear and therefore, the scope of exercising discretionary power by the High Court in condoning the delay beyond the period contemplated for preferring any appeal under the Act does not arise at all. 14. In view of the above legal position, the objection raised by the Registry is sustained and the S.T.A.SR.No.81961 of 2019 is rejected at the SR stage. Registry is directed to upload this order in the High Court web site and to report the same under neutral citation. (S.M.S.,J.) (K.S.,J.) 16-04-2026