https://youtu.be/SyTpOcTxgiM?si=oQFuNgZNEsIEekOA
Follow:
- Next story Justice N. Senthilkumar passes the order following a few applications filed by industrialist M.A.M.R. Muthiah, his wife Geetha Muthiah, and five others
- Previous story Ganesan Judge: Sir , the very mandate of the family court Act 1984 is that it strictly prohibits the very publication of the family court proceeding in any website or portals of the family court as it would amounts to or attempts to invade the privacy of the people who comes to family courts for reliefs under their personal law . As india is predominantly populated with hindu majoritarian secular country by law established, even the right royal way of entry of advocates to prosecute and defend a matter is restricted rather prohibited and the lawyer can appear only to assist the court as the friend of the court and not as lawyer of either side as the family courts Act given such. omelets discretion to the presiding officer of the family courts in family court area and the other courts such safeguards is not available and it is still an anomaly persisting in a family court area and a non- family court area . Due this anomaly, from the decision of family fort appeal lies to high court to be dealt by two judge bench and where as if the same power is exercised by a sub judge in a non family court area , the appeal would lie only the district court . Though the entry of lawyers are completely under the rigorous filtering mechanism of the family court judges , no judge in family court used to refuse the petition filed by the parties seeking to nominate and appoint counsel either to prosecute or defend a matter before family courts . The restricted entry has been more or less made as a wind and the family courts are the place flooded with lawyers
Recent Posts
- THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN WA No.1712 of 2026 and CMP N o .15620 of 2026 E.Jeyaprabhu S/o Elango Shanmugam, Plot No.19, Bharathi Street, Krishnamoorthy Nagar, K.K.Nagar, Tiruchirappalli-620 021. Appellant(s) Vs 1. The Director Department of Geology and Mining, Guindy, Chennai-600 032. 2. The Additional Chief Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 3. The Director General of Police, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai-600 004. Respondent(s)
- [02/07, 20:15] sekarreporter1: “Advocate M.Gnanasekar represented the Appellant while Government Pleader K. Kumaran represented the Respondent. Issue The issue before the Bench was whether a routine case-management entry, a e-court status update, or an order purely tracking the” https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/rnaresh-v-the-principal-secretary-to-government-2026mhc2328-e-court-case-status-writ-appeal-1617003#:~:text=Advocate%20M.Gnanasekar,purely%20tracking%20the [02/07, 20:15] sekarreporter1: E-Court Case Status Or Adjournment Order Doesn’t Possess Traits Of Judgment; Writ Appeal Against It Not Maintainable: Madras High Court https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/rnaresh-v-the-principal-secretary-to-government-2026mhc2328-e-court-case-status-writ-appeal-1617003 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme Court & Other Legal Updates:-* https://www.verdictum.in/social-media
- ஏ.ஐ. தொழில்நுட்பத்தை பயன்படுத்தி வழங்கப்பட்ட தீர்ப்பை ரத்துசெய்தது உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் #SupremeCourt
- THE HON’BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN WP No. 6248 of 2026 Tamilazhagan ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Prison Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009 2. The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons Whannels Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008 3. The Superintendent of prisons, Central prison-I, Puzhal, Chennai-600 066 4. The Tamil Nadu State Legal Services
- Dismissed ponmudy case order. HON’BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL RC No. 645 of 2026 AND CRL MP NO. 4867 OF 2026 K.Ponmudi S/o.late.M.Kandaswamy
More
Recent Posts
- THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN WA No.1712 of 2026 and CMP N o .15620 of 2026 E.Jeyaprabhu S/o Elango Shanmugam, Plot No.19, Bharathi Street, Krishnamoorthy Nagar, K.K.Nagar, Tiruchirappalli-620 021. Appellant(s) Vs 1. The Director Department of Geology and Mining, Guindy, Chennai-600 032. 2. The Additional Chief Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009. 3. The Director General of Police, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai-600 004. Respondent(s)
- [02/07, 20:15] sekarreporter1: “Advocate M.Gnanasekar represented the Appellant while Government Pleader K. Kumaran represented the Respondent. Issue The issue before the Bench was whether a routine case-management entry, a e-court status update, or an order purely tracking the” https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/rnaresh-v-the-principal-secretary-to-government-2026mhc2328-e-court-case-status-writ-appeal-1617003#:~:text=Advocate%20M.Gnanasekar,purely%20tracking%20the [02/07, 20:15] sekarreporter1: E-Court Case Status Or Adjournment Order Doesn’t Possess Traits Of Judgment; Writ Appeal Against It Not Maintainable: Madras High Court https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/rnaresh-v-the-principal-secretary-to-government-2026mhc2328-e-court-case-status-writ-appeal-1617003 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme Court & Other Legal Updates:-* https://www.verdictum.in/social-media
- ஏ.ஐ. தொழில்நுட்பத்தை பயன்படுத்தி வழங்கப்பட்ட தீர்ப்பை ரத்துசெய்தது உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் #SupremeCourt
- THE HON’BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN WP No. 6248 of 2026 Tamilazhagan ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Prison Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009 2. The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons Whannels Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008 3. The Superintendent of prisons, Central prison-I, Puzhal, Chennai-600 066 4. The Tamil Nadu State Legal Services
- Dismissed ponmudy case order. HON’BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL RC No. 645 of 2026 AND CRL MP NO. 4867 OF 2026 K.Ponmudi S/o.late.M.Kandaswamy