You may also like...
-
[6/25, 10:53] Sekarreporter 1: [6/25, 10:52] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1276022662381236224?s=08 [6/25, 10:53] Sekarreporter 1: [6/25, 10:50] Sekarreporter 1: Lawyer v balaji seek action against dcp [6/25, 10:50] Sekarreporter 1: 🍁🍁 [6/25, 11:22] Sekarreporter 1: [6/25, 11:20] Balaji Mhc Advt Ttv: Atrocity meted out to me by the Deputy commissioner Rajesh kannan IPS request for an inquiry and for initiating criminal action and discipliary proceeding I am proceeding to the nearby Nammalwarpet market which is situated at a distance of just about one hundred meters and that I explained my health condition and the urgency of the essential goods the Police officer immediately came near to me and took the keys of my two Wheeler.immediately I disclosed my identity that I am practicing advocate in the Madras High court and requested to allow me the above said police officer immediately got emotional and throw away the keys of my two Wheeler into the nearby cooumriver. I was stunned at the inordinate behavior of the above police officer move in pil [6/25, 11:22] Sekarreporter 1: 🍁🍁
by Sekar Reporter · Published June 25, 2020
-
Sterlite order welcome video
by Sekar Reporter · Published August 18, 2020
-
Answers to the Issues : I concur with the findings of the Trial Court in respect of the issue No.1 in the Original Suit that the suit is maintainable. I concur with the findings of the Trial Court that the order made in O.A.No.34 of 1995 and O.A.No.37 of 1985 are final. I answer the issue No.3 in the Original Suit that the plaintiff is entitled for declaration. I answer the issue No.4 in the Original Suit that the second defendant is the Hereditary Trustee of the first defendant, endowment. I answer the issue No.5 in the Original Suit that the plaintiff is also entitled for recovery of possession from the second defendant. As far as the damages and quantum are concerned, opportunity is given for the plaintiff to comply by way of an application for quantification of the damages as to be recovered. Therefore, the judgment and decree of the Trial Court does not need any interference. The Result: In the result, this Appeal Suit in A.S.No.397 of 2010 is dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 14.12.2022 Index : yes Speaking order grs To The VI Additional Judge, City Civil Court, The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court of Madras. D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J., grs Pre-Delivery Judgment in A.S.No.397 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010 14.12.2022 [1] 2011-2-L.W. 1 [2] (2006) 1 SCC 257, para No.7
by Sekar Reporter · Published December 30, 2022