You may also like...
-
Justice M Dhandapani said that petitioner L Nagaraj worked as assistant executive engineer in the department for more than 33 years and retired without any blemish. Hence, the charge memo issued against him after his retirement is unsustainable. He was working in Tangedco at Pugalur in Trichy district and retired from service on June 30, 2014. After the petitioner’s retirement, there was a family dispute between the petitioner and his second son-in-law Vijaya Kumar.
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 22, 2021
-
Justice T.S.Sivagnanam and Justice V.Bhavani Subbaroyan held that it will not only be a case of filing inaccurate particulars, but also a case of concealment of income. The court further noted that the information came to the Department through the AIR, which was forwarded by the Registration Department and after verifying the same, when notice was issued under Section 143(2), the assessee, for the first time stated that due to inadvertence, they did not disclose the particulars relating to the capital gains.
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 11, 2020
-
Special court convicts 11 TNLA members in Andimadam case:
by Sekar Reporter · Published November 30, 2019