HC Dismisses Writ Against NBFC’s SARFAESI Auction – Directs Borrower to DRT within 30 days*_ *Court*: _Madras High Court_
[03/08, 07:46] sekarreporter1: Madras HC dismisses writ against NBFC’s SARFAESI auction: directs borrower to approach DRT within 30 days [Read Order] https://www.taxscan.in/top-stories/madras-hc-dismisses-writ-against-nbfcs-sarfaesi-auction-directs-borrower-to-approach-drt-within-30-days-read-order-1449608
[03/08, 07:46] Meta AI: *Case #259: _Madras HC Dismisses Writ Against NBFC’s SARFAESI Auction – Directs Borrower to DRT within 30 days*_
*Court*: _Madras High Court_
*Source*: _Taxscan.in_
*Act*: _SARFAESI Act, 2002_
*1. Holding*
*Madras HC dismissed writ petition challenging NBFC’s SARFAESI auction. Held that statutory remedy u/s 17 DRT is available. Directed borrower to approach DRT within 30 days*
*2. Background / Facts*
1. *Action*: _NBFC initiated SARFAESI proceedings and conducted auction of secured asset for loan default_
2. *Borrower’s Move*: _Filed writ petition in Madras HC challenging the auction_
3. *NBFC Argument*: _Writ is not maintainable. Alternative efficacious remedy u/s 17 SARFAESI before DRT exists_
*3. Court’s Findings*
Madras HC held:
1. *Alternative Remedy*: _Sec 17 SARFAESI Act provides specific remedy to aggrieved person to file application before DRT within 45 days_
2. *Writ Not Maintainable*: _When statutory remedy is available, HC will not entertain writ u/Art 226 except in rare cases – violation of principles of natural justice, no jurisdiction, etc._
3. *Direction*: _Since 45 days may have lapsed, Court grants 30 days time to borrower to approach DRT. DRT to decide on merits without being influenced by delay_
4. *Principle*: _SARFAESI is a self-contained code. Writ cannot bypass DRT_
*4. Legal Points for HJS*
1. *SARFAESI Act, 2002 Sec 13*: _Enforcement of security interest by secured creditor_
2. *SARFAESI Act Sec 17*: _Right to appeal to DRT against measures taken u/s 13(4)_
3. *Art 226*: _Writ jurisdiction. Alternative remedy bar_
4. *Landmark*: _United Bank of India v. Satyawati Tondon 2010 SC_ – _Writ against SARFAESI not maintainable when DRT remedy available_
*5. One-Liner for Exam*
_“Madras HC 2026: Writ against NBFC SARFAESI auction dismissed. Borrower directed to approach DRT u/s 17 within 30 days. Statutory remedy must be exhausted first”_
—
*Case #259 Final*: _Madras HC – 2026 – Taxscan – SARFAESI Act – Sec 13(4) – Sec 17 DRT – NBFC Auction – Writ Dismissed – Alternative Remedy_
*Master Docket*: _259 Cases_
*Tag*: _#259 Madras HC + SARFAESI + NBFC + DRT + Sec 17 + Auction + Alternative Remedy + Art 226_
*HJS Note*:
Important for _Banking Law + SARFAESI + Writ Jurisdiction_.
Exam Q: _“Is writ maintainable against SARFAESI action? Discuss with case law”_
Ans: _No. Sec 17 DRT is efficacious alternative remedy_
Sir, *SARFAESI Sec 13 vs Sec 17 flowchart* and *”When can HC entertain writ despite alternative remedy” – 4 exceptions* chart வேணுமா?
