Division Bench held that affiliation fees collected by Universities are taxable and do not fall within the exemption granted under Entry 66 of

[17/02, 12:24] sekarreporter1: ”
Home
Products
What’s New
Query
Free Trial
Login

INR (₹)
Print
17.02.2026: AFFILIATION FEES COLLECTED BY UNIVERSITIES IS NOT COVERED UNDER ENTRY 66 OF NN. 12/2017-CTR, HENCE TAXABLE UNDER GST: MADRAS HIGH COURT
Facts of the Case:

In this case, the Bharathidasan University challenged notices of intimation of liability issued under Section 74(5). Separate notices were issued for the financial years 2019–2020, 2020–2021, 2021–2022 and 2022–2023, alleging that the affiliation fees collected by the University from colleges affiliated to it were liable to GST along with interest and penalty. The Department contended that affiliation services are not services provided to students in connection with admission or conduct of examination and therefore do not fall within the exemption granted under Entry 66 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. According to the Department, affiliation is an independent regulatory activity and hence taxable. The University, on the other hand, argued that it is an “Educational Institution” within the meaning of the notification and that affiliation is a prerequisite for colleges to admit students and conduct examinations. It was contended that affiliation is intrinsically connected with the process of admission and examination and therefore qualifies as a service relating to admission or conduct of examination, which is exempt.

Issue:

Whether affiliation fees collected by a University from colleges fall within the exemption under Entry 66 of Notification No. 12/2017-CTR as services relating to admission or conduct of examination by an educational institution, or whether such fees are liable to GST.

Held That:

The Division Bench held that affiliation fees collected by Universities are taxable and do not fall within the exemption granted under Entry 66 of Notification No. 12/2017-CTR. The Court observed that exemption notifications in fiscal statutes must be interpreted strictly, and the language of Entry 66 clearly exempts only services provided by an educational institution to its students, faculty and staff, and services relating to admission to or conduct of examination by such institution. The Court held that affiliation is a regulatory function carried out by the University to assess whether a college has adequate infrastructure, faculty and facilities before permitting it to function under its aegis. Affiliation is a prerequisite to enable a college to admit students, but it is not itself a service relating to admission or conduct of examination. Admission of students commences only after affiliation is granted, and therefore affiliation is anterior and independent of admission and examination.

The Court further observed that subsequent clarificatory circulars issued by the Government and the insertion of a specific exemption (Entry 66A) for affiliation services provided to Government schools indicate legislative intent that affiliation services are otherwise taxable. The Court rejected the purposive and extended interpretation adopted in the earlier judgment and held that regulatory control over intake capacity does not convert affiliation into a service relating to admission.

Accordingly, the reference was answered by holding that affiliation charges collected by Universities from colleges are amenable to levy of GST. The matters were remitted back to the learned Single Judge for consideration of other grounds, if any.

Case Name: Bharathidasan University, Rep. By its Registrar, Palkalaiperur Versus The Joint Commissioner of GST (ST-Intelligence) Trichy Division, Tiruchirappali, The State Tax Officer, Tiruchirapalli dated 10.02.2026

Quick Links

Home
About
Demo
GST Blogs
GST Council Decisions
Login
HSN/SAC
Taxo Prime Time
Channel Partner Search
Our Services
TAXO GST 360
HSN Rate Utility
Due Dates Calendar
GST Master Classes
Advertise With Us
Events
Institutional Licensing
Careers
Publish With Us
Partner With Us
GST Query
Call Us: +91 9540 002 184
Call Us: +91 7289 800 700
Mail ID : info@taxo.online
Query/Feedback Form
Our Experts will g
[17/02, 12:24] Meta AI: The Madras High Court has ruled that affiliation fees collected by universities from affiliated colleges are taxable under GST and do not fall within the exemption granted under Entry 66 of Notification No. 12/2017-CTR. The court held that affiliation is a regulatory function carried out by the university to assess whether a college has adequate infrastructure, faculty, and facilities, and is not a service relating to admission or conduct of examination.

The university had argued that affiliation is a prerequisite for colleges to admit students and conduct examinations, and therefore qualifies as a service relating to admission or conduct of examination, which is exempt. However, the court rejected this argument, stating that exemption notifications in fiscal statutes must be interpreted strictly. ¹ ² ³

Would you like to know more about the implications of this judgment or the GST exemption for educational institutions?
[17/02, 12:24] sekarreporter1: https://taxo.online/latest-news/17-02-2026-affiliation-fees-collected-by-universities-is-not-covered-under-entry-66-of-nn-12-2017-ctr-hence-taxable-under-gst-madras-high-court/
[17/02, 12:24] Meta AI: The Madras High Court has ruled that affiliation fees collected by universities from affiliated colleges are taxable under GST and do not fall within the exemption granted under Entry 66 of Notification No. 12/2017-CTR. The court held that affiliation is a regulatory function carried out by the university to assess whether a college has adequate infrastructure, faculty, and facilities, and is not a service relating to admission or conduct of examination.

The university had argued that affiliation fees are exempt from GST as they are collected in connection with the admission of students and the conduct of examinations. However, the court rejected this argument, stating that exemption notifications in fiscal statutes must be interpreted strictly, and the language of Entry 66 clearly exempts only services provided by an educational institution to its students, faculty, and staff, and services relating to admission to or conduct of examination by such institution. ¹ ² ³

Would you like to know more about the implications of this judgment or the GST exemption for educational institutions?