Cm stalin pressmeet
Follow:
- Next story Sathis kumar judge The rally in Karur turned into a major disaster following concerns raised by the Madras High Court. The High Court had last week asked whether such a large number of people would not cause accidents and what would happen if something happened to people
- Previous story “Conclusion: 31. In the present case, the respondents relied on the bank statement produced by the petitioner. It is the statement issued by the Bank of Baroda, Virugambakkam, Tamil Nadu. The account stands in the name of the petitioner. The statements of accounts from 03.01.2024 till 26.01.2025 have been produced before this Court. Perusal of the statement would show that the petitioner has deposited a sum of Rs.58,06,479.20/-. That apart, the petitioner himself admitted that he has two properties in his name and he has made no attempt to alienate the said properties.” https://www.sekarreporter.com/mr-justice-s-m-subramaniam-and-the-honourable-mr-justice-mohammed-shaffiq-cmp-no-19328-of-2025-in-osa-sr-no-17760-of-2025-s-venkatesan/#:~:text=Conclusion%3A%0A31,the%20said%20properties.
Recent Posts
- CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRL.O.P.No.17359 of 2026 1. Sureshkumar 2. Narayanan ..Petitioners Vs. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Civil Supplies CID, Chennai. Crime No.149 of 2025 ..Respondent
- 15.With the above observations, the impugned order dated 20.09.2023 passed in W.P.No.4228 of 2020 is set aside and the writ appeal stands allowed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed. [S.M.S., J.] [N.S., J.]
- The Second Appeals stand Partly Allowed. The defendants 2 and 3 are entitled to 1/12 share each in the suit property. The plaintiff and the 4th defendant are/HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR S.A.Nos.601, 612 and 614 of 2023 and C.M.P.Nos.19260, 19344 and 19365 of 2023 Lakshmana Gounder (Since Deceased) 1.Sengottaiyan 2.Krishnan 3.Mani … Appellants
- http://youtube.com/post/UgkxNd-kPNaPuZeUpk3uJnY2icCzwBDluPN3?si=wfT5eBnznWbRgir_ [20/07, 13:07] sekarreporter1: Partition Suit Pending Till Final Decree Can Account For Birth & Death Of Sharers: Madras High Court The Madras High Court partly allowed second appeals in a partition dispute after holding that the death of a sharer pending the first appeal had to be accounted for before final partition by metes and bounds.
- Judge Anand Venkadesh order to prepare seniority list
More
Recent Posts
- CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRL.O.P.No.17359 of 2026 1. Sureshkumar 2. Narayanan ..Petitioners Vs. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Civil Supplies CID, Chennai. Crime No.149 of 2025 ..Respondent
- 15.With the above observations, the impugned order dated 20.09.2023 passed in W.P.No.4228 of 2020 is set aside and the writ appeal stands allowed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed. [S.M.S., J.] [N.S., J.]
- The Second Appeals stand Partly Allowed. The defendants 2 and 3 are entitled to 1/12 share each in the suit property. The plaintiff and the 4th defendant are/HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR S.A.Nos.601, 612 and 614 of 2023 and C.M.P.Nos.19260, 19344 and 19365 of 2023 Lakshmana Gounder (Since Deceased) 1.Sengottaiyan 2.Krishnan 3.Mani … Appellants
- http://youtube.com/post/UgkxNd-kPNaPuZeUpk3uJnY2icCzwBDluPN3?si=wfT5eBnznWbRgir_ [20/07, 13:07] sekarreporter1: Partition Suit Pending Till Final Decree Can Account For Birth & Death Of Sharers: Madras High Court The Madras High Court partly allowed second appeals in a partition dispute after holding that the death of a sharer pending the first appeal had to be accounted for before final partition by metes and bounds.
- Judge Anand Venkadesh order to prepare seniority list