You may also like...
-
In view thereof, this Criminal Revision Case is partly allowed on the following terms, (i) The conviction of the petitioner for the offences under Section 279, 337 of the IPC (19 counts), 338 of the IPC (22 counts), and 304(A) of IPC (8 counts), shall stand confirmed. However, the sentence of imprisonment alone is modified as period already undergone by the petitioner; (ii) The fine amount imposed by the Trial Court in respect of the offences shall stand confirmed and the fact that it is already paid is recorded. 07.01.2026 Jer Neutral citation : No To 1.The IV Additional District and Sessions Judge Coimbatore.
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 12, 2026
-
[5/18, 12:46] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1262280704823398400?s=08 [5/18, 12:46] Sekarreporter 1: M.Sathyanarayanan & Anita Sumanth heard the public interest litigation petition filed by Surya Vetrikondan (Advocate) seeking direction to the Chief Secretary to make necessary orders or provisions to accommodate the job seekers who would lose their eligibility due to the increase in the retirement age of present government employees. Order.. dismissed the petition, observed that the service matters are not maintainable under the public interest litigation, providing liberty to the petitioner to know the stage/status of his representation dated 07.05.2020 under the RTI.
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 18, 2020
-