You may also like...
-
P.N. Prakash, J. Crl.R.C. Nos. 819 to 822 of 2013. D/d. 24.01.2020.Dishonour of Cheque – Complainant is not required to prove the debt – However, the complainant is required to plead about the existence of the debt in the complaint. Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 – Dishonour of Cheque – Presumption under sections 118 and 139 – Complainant is not required to prove the debtHeard Mr. R. Sankarappan, learned counsel for the accused and Mr. M. Arvind Kumar, learned counsel for the complainant.
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 9, 2020
-
Madras high court Youtube press news
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 12, 2026
-
IN THE COURT OF SESSIONS AT CHENNAI Present: Thiru R. Selvakumar, B.A., M.L., Principal Sessions Judge Wednesday, the 22nd day of September, 2021 Crl.M.P.Nos.15850 and 16371/2021 in CCBI Crime No.32/2021 Sam Abisheik .. Petitioner in Crl.M.P.No.15850/2021 /Accused Tamilselvi @ Meera Mithun .. Petitioner in bail granted
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 22, 2021
