You may also like...
-
Consequently, I find all the charges against the accused under Section 120(b) read with Sections 381 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, as well as Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, to be proved. For the proven charges, the Trial Court imposed only the minimum sentence of one year and a fine of Rs.1,000/-, which does not warrant interference. 24. Accordingly, finding no merits, this Criminal Appeal stands dismissed. The appellant is granted twelve weeks time, from the date of receipt of a web-copy of this order, to surrender before the Trial Court to undergo the sentence. 16.09.2025 Neutral Citation : yes grs To 1. The XIII Additional Special Judge for CBI Cases, Chennai. 2. The Inspector of Police, SPE/CBI/ACB/Chennai. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. grs Crl.A.No.385 of 2014 16.09.2025
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 16, 2025
-
In an unusual incident at the Supreme Court on Monday, a person attempted to throw an object at Chief Justice of India BR Gavai during the morning session. The man, who was heard shouting slogans, was quickly escorted out of the courtroom by security personnel. The incident caused a brief interruption for a few minutes in proceedings before the session resumed. According to lawyers present, the individual shouted, “Sanatan Dharam ka apmaan nahi sahega Hindustan” (“India will not tolerate disrespect towards Sanatan Dharma”) while being removed from the courtroom. Some witnesses claimed he tried to throw a shoe, while others said he appeared to be hurling a roll of paper. The man was reportedly dressed in a lawyer’s robe. Despite the disturbance, Chief Justice Gavai remained composed and continued with the day’s proceedings. Asking the next lawyer to make submissions, the CJI remarked, “Don’t get distracted. We are not distracted by this.”
by Sekar Reporter · Published October 6, 2025
-
In view of the aforesaid, there shall be an order of interim stay of the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge in regard to the running of the Bar by the TASMAC shop in question, finding prima-facie case in favour of the appellants/TASMAC in reference to the arguments made by the learned Advocate General. THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE and D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY , J cs W.A.No.883 of 2022 and C.M.P.No.5926 of 2022
by Sekar Reporter · Published April 5, 2022
