[6/1, 16:35] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1267411971374305283?s=08 [6/1, 16:36] Sekarreporter 1: Idol case dairy missing elephant Rajendren filed case mhc bench Mmsj ordered notice https://t.co/wxxsb5F8xg

by Sekar Reporter · June 1, 2020

[6/1, 16:35] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1267411971374305283?s=08
[6/1, 16:36] Sekarreporter 1: Idol case dairy missing elephant Rajendren filed case mhc bench Mmsj ordered notice https://t.co/wxxsb5F8xg

Share this post:

Share on X (Twitter) Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on Email

You may also like...

• 

  http://youtube.com/post/Ugkx7l7aTXkJpiU_qKVBeP1I1vWDORr_OSq8?si=KAjUZjGJhmsexy9E [24/03, 15:38] sekarreporter1: [24/03, 15:35] sekarreporter1: BHARATIYA JANATA PARTY TAMIL NADU – LEGAL CELL State Head Office: “Kamalalayam” 19, Vaidyaram Street, T. Nagar, Chennai – 600017 A. KUMARAGURU M.A., B.L., Date 24/3/26 Advocate & Notary STATE PRESIDENT To The Chief Electoral Officer, Public (Elections) Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600009 Madam, Sub: Complaint against the District Collector, Kanyakumari -Violation of Model Code of Conduct – Request for Immediate Transfer – Reg. I respectfully submit as follows: On 23.03.2026, a truck bearing Registration No. TN 30 L 0896, belonging to VRL Logistics Limited, arrived at the Collectorate, Nagercoil. On suspicion, our party members inspected the premises and enquired about the contents of the said vehicle. The officials present informed that several hundreds of sewing machines were being unloaded for distribution to beneficiaries under the “Ungaludan Stalin” scheme.

  March 24, 2026

   by Sekar Reporter · Published March 24, 2026

• 

  Such view of the matter, this Court is of the view that as the dispute itself is not resolved by MSEF Council, only the matter has been referred to Arbitration with the consent of the parties, further the contract governing the parties also provides for such reference to arbitration, the second respondent has also already invoked the Arbitration Clause by issuing notice in the year 2013 itself and the petitioner has also participated in the said arbitration proceedings, now the petitioner cannot challenge the impugned order at this belated stage that to when the arbitration proceedings is in the final stage. Further, when the parties have consciously agreed to resolve the dispute arising out of the contract by way of arbitration, they can very well agitate their right before the Arbitrator and canvass their points and no prejudice would be caused to them since the Arbitrator has been independently appointed by the Arbitration Center of the Madras High Court. Such view of the matter, this Court finds no merit in this writ petition and the writ petition is liable to be dismissed and accordingly dismissed. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs. 03.01.2023 Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No kk To The Chairman, Micro Small Enterprises Facilitation Council, Represented by its Regional Joint Director of Industries and Commerce, Thiru-vi-ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032. The Hon’ble Presiding Arbitrator, Madras High Court Arbitration Centre, High Court, Parry’s Corner, George Town, Chennai – 600 108. N.SATHISH KUMAR, J. kk W.P.No.6216 of 2021 and W.M.P.No.6834 of 2021 03.01.2023

  January 7, 2023

   by Sekar Reporter · Published January 7, 2023

• 

  Temple Since the Heritage Commission is to be constituted – Keeping all matters pending and for reply to be filed by

  February 28, 2026

   by Sekar Reporter · Published February 28, 2026