Follow:
- Next story – The Single Judge Bench of Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayan took into consideration the decision of division bench in the case of Meethelaveetil Kaitheri Muralidharan V. Union of India wherein it was held that if a person does not vacate office and continues to be a director of a company, it is necessary that such person continues to retain the DIN. In this connection, it is also pertinent to point out that it is not possible to file either the financial statements or the annual returns without a DIN. Consequently, the director of the Defaulting Company would be required to retain the DIN so as to make good the deficiency by filing the respective documents. Thus, apart from the fact that the AQD Rules do not empower the ROC to deactivate the DIN, such deactivation would also be contrary to Section 164(2) read with 167(1) of CA 2013 inasmuch as the person concerned would continue to be a director of the Defaulting Company. -+Order passed without disposing objections makes Assessment void: ITAT [Read Order]CBIC extends Validity of AEO Certification to Ease of Renewal Process [
- Previous story Excellent interview singaravelan sir senior advocate by mafffi young advt law student in italy
Recent Posts
- 0:05] Vinothpandian: 2019 (6) : Dr swapan kumar banerjee vs state of west bengal : mere fact that wife did not file petition for grant of maintenance during pendency of matrimonial proceedings would not disentitle her to claim maintenance ( section 125 CRPC 1973 )
- Hon’ble Mr. Justice Krishnan Ramasamy issued the interim stay after hearing Mr. P. Wilson, senior advocate representing the government company. The petitioner, TACTV, challenged the demand made by the Joint
- Observing that the Tamil Nadu Police Department lags behind in leveraging information technology, the Madras High Court has directed it to ensure that the entire process of a criminal case, right from the stage of receipt of a complaint till the delivery of judgment,
- [02/05, 08:49] sekarreporter1: Justice A.D. Jagadish Chandira took serious note of the long delay in implementing the Crime and Criminal Tracking Network & Systems (CCTNS) 2.0 project by the State Police Department and ordered that it should be put in place within four months, failing which the department must come up with a valid justification. [02/05, 08:49] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxDwdh_rbwBeP8xNXfKlXK8_fpAWoayz-k?si=nG07y9CgpwuuVoE_
- குலுங்க குலுங்க சிரித்த நீதிபதிகள்
More
Recent Posts
- 0:05] Vinothpandian: 2019 (6) : Dr swapan kumar banerjee vs state of west bengal : mere fact that wife did not file petition for grant of maintenance during pendency of matrimonial proceedings would not disentitle her to claim maintenance ( section 125 CRPC 1973 )
- Hon’ble Mr. Justice Krishnan Ramasamy issued the interim stay after hearing Mr. P. Wilson, senior advocate representing the government company. The petitioner, TACTV, challenged the demand made by the Joint
- Observing that the Tamil Nadu Police Department lags behind in leveraging information technology, the Madras High Court has directed it to ensure that the entire process of a criminal case, right from the stage of receipt of a complaint till the delivery of judgment,
- [02/05, 08:49] sekarreporter1: Justice A.D. Jagadish Chandira took serious note of the long delay in implementing the Crime and Criminal Tracking Network & Systems (CCTNS) 2.0 project by the State Police Department and ordered that it should be put in place within four months, failing which the department must come up with a valid justification. [02/05, 08:49] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxDwdh_rbwBeP8xNXfKlXK8_fpAWoayz-k?si=nG07y9CgpwuuVoE_
- குலுங்க குலுங்க சிரித்த நீதிபதிகள்