You may also like...
-
In fine, this Court sets aside the judgment and decree of the first Appellate Judge/II Additional District Judge, Chidambaram, in A.S.No.10 of 2015 dated 03.09.2018 and restores the judgment and decree of trial Judge/Subordinate Judge, Chidambaram. in O.S.No.27 of 2008 dated 06.01.2015 in decreeing the suit in favour of appellants and allows the Second Appeal with the costs of appellants throughout. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, is closed. Mra 31.01.2022 Internet: Yes Index : Yes Speaking/Non speaking order To The II Additional District Judge, Chidambaram. The Subordinate Judge, Chidambaram. G.CHANDRASEKHARAN, J., mra Judgment in S.A.No.733 of 2019 31.01.2022
by Sekar Reporter · Published November 13, 2022
-
PARTIES: AHMED GANI NATCHIAR vs COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS Appearances: For Appellant: Ms. Shabnam Banu For Respondent: Depratment Representative- Joint Commissioner This appeal arose before The Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) challenging on the absolute confiscation of 626 grams of gold jewellery that belonged to the Appellant, a resident of Malaysia, under Sections 111(d) and 111(l) of the Customs Act, 1962 and imposition of penalty under Section 112(a) of the same Act by the customs authorities. The appellant was intercepted at the Airport and was interogated and gold jewellery was seized.
by Sekar Reporter · Published June 16, 2020
-
W.P.No.3265 of 2020 W.P.No.3265 of 2020 N.KIRUBAKARAN, J. and P.VELMURUGAN, J. (Order of the Court was made by N.Kirubakaran, J) Mr.K.Makesh, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice on behalf of respondents 1 and 4; Mrs.Karthikaa Ashok, learned standing counsel takes notice on behalf of respondents 2 and 3. Nkkj pvj 11 question regarding proptery tax
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 12, 2020