Kanadasan son case mhc order
Follow:
- Next story Head notes /M Ravi Advocate / A) Tamil Nadu Civil Service (Disciplinary and Appeal) Rules, 1955 – Rule 17(b) – Tamil Nadu Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1973 – Delay in disciplinary proceedings – Petitioner, a Village Administrative Officer, was dismissed after a decade-long delay in proceedings for alleged irregularities in land issuance – The court found the delay prejudicial and discriminatory, as co-delinquents faced lesser penalties – The court emphasized the need for timely resolution in disciplinary matters. (Paras 3, 4, 25, 27
- Previous story Justice Mrs.Mala as Item No.24. Where Senior Advocate and Former State PP Mr.A.Natarajan appeared for the son of Kaviarasu Kannadhasan and sought the court intervention against the rejection order passed by Tamil Nadu EB department, who refused to provide EB connection
Recent Posts
- In her reply speech, Justice Trivedi expressed gratitude and said that she is satisfied that she always acted as per her inner conscience.
- Supreme Court Collegium Recommends Karnataka High Court Judge As Next Chief Justice Of Manipur High Court
- Justices P Velmurugan and KK Ramakrishnan passed the directions on a PIL petition moved by P Ramesh (52) of Nerur in Manmangalam taluk of Karur. Ramesh in his plea stated that the Aravayee
- Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan while hearing the case where the Respondent- MP Road Development Corporation (“MPRDC”) had initially participated in arbitration
- Arbitration
More
Recent Posts
- In her reply speech, Justice Trivedi expressed gratitude and said that she is satisfied that she always acted as per her inner conscience.
- Supreme Court Collegium Recommends Karnataka High Court Judge As Next Chief Justice Of Manipur High Court
- Justices P Velmurugan and KK Ramakrishnan passed the directions on a PIL petition moved by P Ramesh (52) of Nerur in Manmangalam taluk of Karur. Ramesh in his plea stated that the Aravayee
- Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan while hearing the case where the Respondent- MP Road Development Corporation (“MPRDC”) had initially participated in arbitration
- Arbitration
