47] Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) DRTC 56 : naveed ahmed vs karnataka bank ltd : An order being an authoritative direction , injunction or mandate , it is decision of a court or judge made or entered in writing , it should necessarily.contain reasons

[09/02, 10:47] Vinothpandian: AIR 2006 cal 92 : madan mohan das vs karthick chandra das : order 8 rule CPC 1908 : defendant appeared inspite of fact that no summons was issued to him . ” written statement filed beyond expiry of 90 days can be accepted
[09/02, 10:47] Vinothpandian: 2009 (9) SCC 164 : mankamma vs state of kerala : when it is found that the evidence has been appreciated in a mechanical manner and without proper consideration of facts and circumstances on record , court in the interest of justice re – appreciate evidences
[09/02, 10:47] Vinothpandian: 2016 (1) DRTC 270 : pushpinder kaur vs punjab and sindh bank : RDDBFI act sec 20 : Held absence of counsel due to strike call cannot be a legal and valid or sufficient ground for recalling order passed dismissing appeal for non – prosecution
[09/02, 10:47] Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) DRTC 56 : naveed ahmed vs karnataka bank ltd : An order being an authoritative direction , injunction or mandate , it is decision of a court or judge made or entered in writing , it should necessarily.contain reasons