25, 17:17] Sekarreporter 1: [6/25, 17:16] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1276119334734098433?s=08 [6/25, 17:16] Sekarreporter 1: Hon’ble Madras High Court, while holding “any regulation made by the University which either dilutes or is inconsistent with the MCI regulations cannot be held to be valid”, allowed Writ Petitions, filed by two medical students of Pondicherry University and declared them ‘Pass’ in a subject, by a common verdict rendered today, by His Lordship Mr.Justice R.Subramanian. [6/25, 17:16] Sekarreporter 1: For petner advt Neelakandan argued [6/25, 17:17] Sekarreporter 1: W.P.Nos. 3958 and 4020 of 2020 Prayer in WP 3958 of 2020: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for Writ of Declaration declaring that the petitioner with Register Number 12770737 in first respondent Institution, as ‘PASS’ in Paediatrics subject III Prof. Part II
[6/25, 17:16] Sekarreporter 1: Hon’ble Madras High Court, while holding
“any regulation made by the University which either dilutes or is
inconsistent with the MCI regulations cannot be held to be valid”,
allowed Writ Petitions, filed by two medical students of Pondicherry University and declared them ‘Pass’ in a subject, by a common verdict rendered
today, by His Lordship Mr.Justice R.Subramanian.
[6/25, 17:16] Sekarreporter 1: For petner advt Neelakandan argued
[6/25, 17:17] Sekarreporter 1: W.P.Nos. 3958 and 4020 of 2020
Prayer in WP 3958 of 2020: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India praying for Writ of Declaration declaring that the
petitioner with Register Number 12770737 in first respondent Institution, as
‘PASS’ in Paediatrics subject III Prof. Part II MBBS November, 2019
Examinations conducted by the second respondent within a reasonable time to
be fixed by this Court.
Prayer in WP 4020 of 2020: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India praying for Writ of Declaration declaring that the
petitioner with Register Number 11770714 in first respondent Institution, as
‘PASS’ in Paediatrics subject III Prof. Part II MBBS November, 2019
Examinations conducted by the second respondent within a reasonable time to
be fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr. R.Neelakandan
(in both the petitions)
For Respondents : Mr. A.V.Ramalingam
(in both the petitions) Addl. Govt. Pleader (Pondy) for R1
Mr.M.Ravi, for R2
Mr.V.P.Raman, for R3
Page 3 of 13
http://www.judis.nic.in
![Today law points [2/4, 08:28] K. Selvaraj Mhc Advt: 04.02.2021: K. Selvaraj MHC Adv – Introduction to my Writings: This is my humble attempt in sharing my experience and learning received from the Hon’ble Judges of our High Court, our respected Senior Advocates, my Seniors, my guides as well as my fellow colleagues in the legal profession with the new entrants in the legal profession and it is only for their benefit and learning. Owing to my limitations in this vast field of law, I humbly request everybody involved in this noble profession to aid, correct and guide me in my endeavour to pass on the knowledge of Law, the nuances of our profession and our experiences to our younger generation lawyers. Today’s Law Notes:- The powers and jurisdiction of High Court under Article 226 cannot be taken away or curtailed by any Law or Legislation, even if a Statute says that the decision of an authority or inferior Tribunal is final under the Statute. 1) Dena Bank Vs. Kiritikumar T. Patel [(1999) 2 SCC 106] 2) State of Haryana Vs. Haryana Co-operative Transport Ltd. [(1977) 1 SCC 271] 3) In re Kerala Education Bill [AIR 1958 SC 956] [2/4, 08:32] Sekarreporter1: ..](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
