Monthly Archive: March 2026

Judge Baratha chakraverthy / for there can be no damage to the same (“கேடில் விழுச் செல்வம்”)  and that it should come to his rescue always (“கல்வி ஒருவற் கெழுமையும் ஏமாப் புடைத்து”).  It is to be noted here that bearing the principles in mind, even the University Grants Commission, while framing the University Grants Commission (Grievance Redressal) Regulations, 2018, had included withholding of documents within the definition of the term ‘grievances’ under Regulation 2(f).  

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS   Orders reserved on : 16.02.2026   Orders pronounced on : 09.03.2026   CORAM :   THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY   W.P.No.49758 of 2025 and...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Madras HC allowed karagattam at a Tiruchirappalli temple fest but told dancers to follow the traditional dress code shown in the 1989 film Karagattakaran, not the newer “obscene” outfits. Court stressed the dance’s cultural roots and linked it to offerings for Mariamman.

[11/03, 07:59] sekarreporter1: “Skip To Content JOURNALISM OF COURAGE SUBSCRIBE Home ePaper India Cities UPSC Premium Entertainment Politics Sports World Explained Opinion Business Lifestyle Tech NewsLegalYes to ‘karagattam’ but stick to outfits from 1989...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
The Madras High Court has reaffirmed in a recent appeal case, ACE Foods Ltd v The Registrar of Trade Marks & Anr (2026), that a trademark cannot be deemed abandoned simply based on the party’s delay in filing an affidavit of evidence.

The Madras High Court has reaffirmed in a recent appeal case, ACE Foods Ltd v The Registrar of Trade Marks & Anr (2026), that a trademark cannot be deemed abandoned simply based on the party’s delay in filing an affidavit of evidence.

[11/03, 07:57] sekarreporter1:  Law Asia ABLJ CBLJ Register Login Subscribe Resources Awards gallery A-List lawyers Law firm directory Sections Topics Law.asia home Archive .TV Awards CBLJ Forum•Shanghai 2025 Events Jobs About us Contact...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Advocate Sc Arasu: Mylapore permanent fund nidhi case. Devanathan’sBail petition dismissed in Supreme court Supreme Court Says No to Bail; Asset Auction to Continue in Devanathan Case Date: 9 March 2026Court: Supreme Court of India, Court No. 8Case: SLP (Criminal) No. 3801 of 2026Judges: Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma What the case was about 🔹 Devanathan Yadav filed an appeal in the Supreme Court asking for bail. This was his second effective attempt in the Supreme Court. Earlier, one petition had been withdrawn.

[10/03, 20:31] Advocate Sc Arasu: Mylapore permanent fund nidhi case. Devanathan’sBail petition dismissed in Supreme court Supreme Court Says No to Bail; Asset Auction to Continue in Devanathan Case Date: 9 March 2026Court: Supreme...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version