SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Daily Archive: March 17, 2026

Uncategorized

 by · Published March 17, 2026

Justice AD Jagadish Chandira noted that when there was nothing to show that the men had lit the combustible material, it could not be said that mischief had been committed.

[17/03, 20:25] sekarreporter1: https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-section-435-ipc-no-attempt-to-light-combustible-material-quashed-526732 [17/03, 20:25] sekarreporter1: The Madras High Court recently quashed a criminal case against a group of men for allegedly attempting to damage public property using combustible material near the Central...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published March 17, 2026

As stated supra, we are inclined to follow up with the earlier direction issued by this Court in HCP(MD) No.1383 of 2024 dated 28.11.2024. Hence, there shall be a direction to the Director General of Police to file a status report before this Court. Depending upon the status report, this Court is inclined to issue further directions to ensure that a proper process is evolved in dealing with the persons committing offences by misusing their liberty, by resorting to cancellation of bail rather than detention orders passed under Act 14 of 1982. 15. Post this case under the caption, ‘for filing report’ on 07.04.2026. (N.A.V.,J.) (P.D.B.,J.) 10.03.2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.03.2026 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH AND THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE P.DHANABAL H.C.P.(MD)No.1319 of 2025 Palanivel Rajan @ Ptr Vinoth … Petitioner...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published March 17, 2026

Judge Krishnan Ramasamy / 13. Result: For all the reasons stated above, this Court is not inclined to entertain these cases. Therefore, these writ petitions are dismissed as devoid of merits. The interim stay/injunction orders, if any, granted in these writ petitions stand vacated. No cost. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed. 26.02.2026 Speaking/Non-speaking order Index: Yes / No Neutral Citation: Yes / No nsa KRISHNAN RAMASAMY.J., nsa W.P.No s.29753 & 29755 of 2019 26.02.2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on 26.11.2025 Pronounced on 26.02.2026 CORAM THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.P.Nos.29753 & 29755 of 2019 & W.M.P.Nos .29654, 29885, 29886, 29883 of 2019,...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published March 17, 2026

WHEN DOES ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE BECOME MANDATORY IN NATIONAL HIGHWAY ACQUISITION? MADRAS HC DECODES PV KRISHNAMURTHY ANANT MANDGI V. UNION OF INDIA & NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA | W.P. NOS. 29753 & 29755 OF 2019 | HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASrasras | Justice Krishnan Ramasamy | 26.02.2026

WHEN DOES ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE BECOME MANDATORY IN NATIONAL HIGHWAY ACQUISITION? MADRAS HC DECODES PV KRISHNAMURTHY ANANT MANDGI V. UNION OF INDIA & NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA | W.P. NOS. 29753 & 29755 OF...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published March 17, 2026

The power of judicial review of the High Court under Article 226 is to ensure the processes through which decision has been taken by the competent authority is in consonance with the provisions of the statutes and rules in force but not the decision. In the present case, the procedures were followed scrupulously by affording opportunity to the parties. Both the District Level Committee as well as Writ Court, factually found that the appellants have not established any right. In view of the above findings, this Court finds no further interference is called for. Consequently, the Writ Appeal stands dismissed. No costs. (S.M.S.,J.) (K.S.,J.)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-03-2026 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAdMANIAM AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER WA No. 1992 of 2023 1. A.C.Murugesan No. 184, Vanniyar...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published March 17, 2026

This Court is of the view that the conditions of the tender cannot be altered/modified to make it suitable to the petitioner, as the best person to frame the terms and conditions of the tender is the tender making authority, who has the necessary technical and administrative expertise. 17. In view of the aforesaid finding arrived at, we are not delving into the other authorities cited across the bar on either side. For the foregoing reasons, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, interim applications stand closed. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 17.03.2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No sasi  To: 1. The Election Commission of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17.03.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN WP No.10973 of 2026 and WMP N os...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version