Court News from Madras High Court
[14/01, 09:08] Sekarreporter: “Stating that the GO is in violation of the HR&CE Act which prohibits commercial exploitation of temple properties, he requested the court to quash the order and retransfer the cottages to...
[14/01, 09:03] Sekarreporter: “Justice G R Swaminathan passed the order on a petition filed by S Vijaynarayanan, manager of a religious mutt in Chennai, who sought to quash the April 26, 2024 GO issued...
[14/01, 09:01] Sekarreporter: https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Madurai/caste-killing-of-techie-hc-criticises-cb-cid-for-failure-to-arrest-accused/article70506050.ece [14/01, 09:01] Meta AI: The Madras High Court has criticized the CB-CID for failing to arrest S Krishnakumari, a suspended sub-inspector and mother of the accused, in the Kavin Selvaganesh...
[14/01, 08:53] Sekarreporter: ” NATION WORLD STATES OPINION CITIES BUSINESS SPORT GOOD NEWS MOVIES LIFESTYLE VIDEOS WEB SCRAWL Advertisement Tamil Nadu Madras HC faults CB-CID for not arresting SI-mom in Kavin murder case In...
![Meta AI: The Madras High Court has upheld the CESTAT’s rejection of a limitation plea raised by Modern Engineering & Plastics Pvt Ltd (MEPP) under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act. The appellant, engaged in fabrication, was issued a Show Cause Notice in 2000 for allegedly floating shadow units to evade excise duty. The court noted that the limitation plea was raised for the first time before the Tribunal without supporting facts. Since the issue involved a mixed question of law and fact, and necessary factual material was lacking, the Tribunal was justified in rejecting the plea. The court concluded that the extended limitation period was correctly invoked, and the appeal was dismissed [1]. Key points: – MEPP allegedly floated shadow units to evade excise duty (1995-96) – Limitation plea raised for the first time before CESTAT without facts – Madras HC upheld CESTAT’s rejection of the plea – Appeal dismissed, with no order as to costs https://www.sekarreporter.com/meta-ai-the-madras-high-court-has-upheld-the-cestats-rejection-of-a-limitation-plea-raised-by-modern-engineering-plastics-pvt-ltd-mepp-under-section-11a-of-the-central-excise-act-the-appellant/](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Meta AI: The Madras High Court has upheld the CESTAT’s rejection of a limitation plea raised by Modern Engineering & Plastics Pvt Ltd (MEPP) under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act. The appellant,...
[14/01, 08:04] Sekarreporter: https://indianexpress.com/article/legal-news/madras-high-court-directs-authorities-to-decide-dual-lung-allocation-for-critically-ill-patient-in-3-days-10470194/ [14/01, 08:04] Meta AI: The Madras High Court has directed the National Organ and Tissue Transplant Organization (NOTTO) and the Transplant Authority Government of Tamil Nadu (TRANSTAN) to decide on...
[14/01, 07:56] Sekarreporter: “The Madras High Court has upheld the Customs and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal’s (CESTAT) rejection of a limitation plea that was raised for the first time before it, under Section 11Aof...