Daily Archive: January 9, 2026

Girija Vel: 21.The controversy is narrow. According to the landlady, after the advent of the TNRRLT Act 2017, there was no written tenancy agreement; hence she is entitled to repossession under Section 4(2)(a) of the TNRRLT Act. The tenants, to rebut her claim, had to produce and prove an agreement. The document produced was not received in

[09/01, 08:52] Girija Vel: 21.The controversy is narrow. According to the landlady, after the advent of the TNRRLT Act 2017, there was no written tenancy agreement; hence she is entitled to repossession under Section...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

DismissedTHE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.D. MARIA CLETE C.R.P. (NPD) No.2294 of 2025 and C.M.P. No.13290 of 2025 1) M. Gagan Bothra S/o.Late Shri S.Mukanchand Bothra 2) M.Sandeep Bothra S/o. Late Shri S.Mukanchand Bothra 3) M. Karishma Bothra D/o. Late S.Mukanchand Bothra All at No.8/48 Vijayaragava Road, T.Nagar, Chennai 600 017.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON : 26.09.2025 PRONOUNCED ON : 10.10.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.D. MARIA CLETE C.R.P. (NPD) No.2294 of 2025 and C.M.P. No.13290 of 2025...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

NOTIFICATION NO. 9 / 2026 I. HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR will sit single in His Lordship’s Chambers at 2.15 P.M. on 09.01.2026 and take up the cases as listed through Video Conferencing / Hybrid / Physical Mode. II. HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH and HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN will sit in a Division Bench at 2.15 P.M. on 09.01.2026 and pronounce Orders in the Madurai Bench cases as listed through Video conferencing / Hybrid / Physical Mode. III. HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI will sit in a Division Bench at 2.15 P.M. on 09.01.2026. HON’BLE

[09/01, 08:31] Sekarreporter: NOTIFICATION NO. 9 / 2026 I. HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR will sit single in His Lordship’s Chambers at 2.15 P.M. on 09.01.2026 and take up the cases as listed through Video...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Meta AI: ✅ Madras High Court stayed G.O. for removal of invasive species in Kodaikanal. ✅ Petitioner Theeran Thirumurugan alleges misuse of G.O. and destruction of native Shola species. ✅ Judges: G. Jayachandran and K.K. Ramakrishnan. ✅ Berijam forest area is a significant biodiversity zone with Shola forests, grasslands, and Berijam lake [1]

[09/01, 08:18] Sekarreporter: “HC stays G.O. issued for removal of invasive, exotic species in Kodaikanal, petitioner complains of misuse of G.O. and native Shola species being destroyed Published – January 08, 2026 09:05 pm...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Meta AI: ✅ The Madras High Court dismissed a case against former AIADMK minister K.C. Veeramani with a ₹1 lakh fine. ✅ Veeramani contested the 2021 assembly election in Jolarpet and lost. ✅ A complaint alleged he hid assets in his nomination papers; Income Tax found a ₹14 crore discrepancy. ✅ Election Commission filed a case in Tirupattur court; petitioner sought full investigation. ✅ Judges: Chief Justice M.M. Srivastava and Justice G. Arulmurugan. ✅ Court said Election Commission’s case was pending and dismissed petition, citing possible political motive [1][2][3].

[09/01, 08:03] Meta AI: The Madras High Court dismissed a case against former AIADMK minister K.C. Veeramani with a ₹1 lakh fine. Veeramani contested the 2021 assembly election in Jolarpet and lost. A complaint...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Meta AI: The Madras High Court (Justices R.Suresh Kumar & A.D.Jagadish Chandira) is handling a case (W.P.No.36085 of 2025) involving S.Devi’s petition for a shop at Marina Beach. ✅ The court directed the Greater Chennai Corporation (GCC) to draft a plan for shops at Marina Beach, limiting goods to eatables, toys, and fancy goods/souvenirs. ✅ GCC filed a re-drafted map with 1006 shops (down from 1417). ✅ The court discussed making a large area (100 acres) in Marina Beach a Blue Flag Area to beautify it.

[09/01, 07:59] Meta AI: The Madras High Court (Justices R.Suresh Kumar & A.D.Jagadish Chandira) is handling a case (W.P.No.36085 of 2025) involving S.Devi’s petition for a shop at Marina Beach. ✅ The court directed...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Meta AI: The Madras High Court recently ruled that a person’s right to express their views can’t be restricted with a blanket order, especially when it comes to social media posts. Justice N Senthilkumar emphasized that if someone like Rangaraj wants to restrain posts against him, he needs to prove that there’s commercial exploitation of his personality rights. ¹ ² ³

[09/01, 07:53] Meta AI: The Madras High Court recently ruled that a person’s right to express their views can’t be restricted with a blanket order, especially when it comes to social media posts. Justice...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version