Monthly Archive: September 2025
law of wills : Thiagarajan s vs chitkala govindasamy : will entirely handwritten dated and signed by testator but not signed by required witness ,type written will containing signature of attesting witness cannot be construed as holographic will ,mere non – mentioning of earlier will is not fatal
[29/09, 09:52] Vinothpandian: 2016(3) CTC 501 : law of wills : Thiagarajan s vs chitkala govindasamy : will entirely handwritten dated and signed by testator but not signed by required witness ,type written will...
வழக்கறிஞர் அறிவழகன் சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்ற நீதிபதி தண்டபாணி,முறையீடு செய்தார்.
கரூரில் நடந்த விஜய் பிரச்சாரத்தின் போது கூட்ட நெரிசலில் சிக்கி 39 பேர் பலியான விவகாரம், தொடர்பாக இன்றெ மதியம் 2.15 மணி அளவில் விசாரிக்கப்படும் என சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் அறிவித்துள்ளது. த.வெ.க. தலைவரும், நடிகருமான விஜய், வாரம்தோறும் சனிக்கிழமையன்று பிரசார கூட்டங்களை நடத்தி வருகிறார்....
Justice K Murali Shankar observed that an FIR was registered against the bus driver. In the absence of any contrary evidence regarding negligence, the tribunal,
HC upholds Rs3.7L relief for injured bus passenger Madras high court has upheld the Rs3.76 lakh compensation awarded by motor accident claims tribunal to a youth who sustained injuries when he was travelling in...
Let this exercise be undertaken at the earliest and be completed within a period of three months from today without fail. 22. In view of the aforesaid, the connected application of Wing Commander Kartika Kilam (Retd.) is also allowed in the aforesaid terms. 23. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. …………………………………………J (J.B. PARDIWALA) …………………………………………J (K.V. VISWANATHAN)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NOS.1718-1721/2025(@Diary No.32025/2024) IN CIVIL APPEAL NOS.79-82/2012 WG CDR ANUPAMA JOSHI RETD Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NOS.1722-1725/2025(@Diary...
The High Court is requested to rehear the appeals filed by the respondents/accused respectively in these appeals by also giving an opportunity to the appellant-State herein to make its submission in the said appeals as well as the accused to make this submission in the matter.
2025 INSC 1170 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.736-738/2015 THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Appellant(s) VERSUS ANIL & ORS. Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T...