SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Monthly Archive: February 2023

[2/9, 10:30] sekarreporter1: Madras High Court sets aside detention orders Pointing to violation of procedure, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court set aside the detention orders passed by the Thoothukudi Collector against three persons accused of selling banned tobacco products and Indian-made foreign liquor bottles to school and college students. The court was hearing the petitions filed on behalf of the accused, S. Uchimakali, E. Manikandan and S. Sudalaimani, who had been detained in Palayamkottai Central Prison. The accused challenged the detention order passed in 2022. The detaining authority, after considering [2/9, 10:30] sekarreporter1: .

Uncategorized

 by · Published February 9, 2023

[2/9, 10:30] sekarreporter1: Madras High Court sets aside detention orders Pointing to violation of procedure, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court set aside the detention orders passed by the Thoothukudi Collector against three persons accused of selling banned tobacco products and Indian-made foreign liquor bottles to school and college students. The court was hearing the petitions filed on behalf of the accused, S. Uchimakali, E. Manikandan and S. Sudalaimani, who had been detained in Palayamkottai Central Prison. The accused challenged the detention order passed in 2022. The detaining authority, after considering [2/9, 10:30] sekarreporter1: .

[2/9, 10:30] sekarreporter1: Madras High Court sets aside detention orders Pointing to violation of procedure, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court set aside the detention orders passed by the Thoothukudi Collector against...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
[2/9, 10:31] sekarreporter1: The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has dismissed a batch of petitions challenging the premature release of the 13 life convicts in the sensational Melavalavu massacre case. The 13 life convicts, belonging to an intermediate caste, were released in 2019 to mark the MGR centenary celebrations. They were convicted of the charge of hacking to death six members of the Scheduled Caste in 1997, including Melavalavu panchayat president Murugesan, near Melur in [2/9, 10:31] sekarreporter1: .

Uncategorized

 by · Published February 9, 2023

[2/9, 10:31] sekarreporter1: The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has dismissed a batch of petitions challenging the premature release of the 13 life convicts in the sensational Melavalavu massacre case. The 13 life convicts, belonging to an intermediate caste, were released in 2019 to mark the MGR centenary celebrations. They were convicted of the charge of hacking to death six members of the Scheduled Caste in 1997, including Melavalavu panchayat president Murugesan, near Melur in [2/9, 10:31] sekarreporter1: .

[2/9, 10:31] sekarreporter1: The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has dismissed a batch of petitions challenging the premature release of the 13 life convicts in the sensational Melavalavu massacre case. The 13...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
[2/9, 10:42] sekarreporter1: On Wednesday the Supreme Court Collegium Recommended names for Appointment of Chief Justices in Patna, Himachal Pradesh, Gauhati, and Tripura High Court. [2/9, 10:42] sekarreporter1: .

Uncategorized

 by · Published February 9, 2023

[2/9, 10:42] sekarreporter1: On Wednesday the Supreme Court Collegium Recommended names for Appointment of Chief Justices in Patna, Himachal Pradesh, Gauhati, and Tripura High Court. [2/9, 10:42] sekarreporter1: .

[2/9, 10:42] sekarreporter1: On Wednesday the Supreme Court Collegium Recommended names for Appointment of Chief Justices in Patna, Himachal Pradesh, Gauhati, and Tripura High Court. [2/9, 10:42] sekarreporter1: .

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.595 of 2016 Thiruselvam .. Appellant In view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Kattukandi Edathil Krishnan Vs. Kattukandi Edathil Valsan4, the Original Suit in O.S.No.196 of 2013 is posted for further hearing on 20.01.2023 and it is made clear that the parties shall appear before the Trial Court for continuation of proceedings without any further notice and the Trial Court shall proceed with the final decree proceedings, if an application for final decree is already pending and even if there is no application pending, proceed further without waiting for the parties to file any such application and effect the final division as per the preliminary decree and grant separate possession to the plaintiff.

Uncategorized

 by · Published February 9, 2023

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.595 of 2016 Thiruselvam .. Appellant In view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Kattukandi Edathil Krishnan Vs. Kattukandi Edathil Valsan4, the Original Suit in O.S.No.196 of 2013 is posted for further hearing on 20.01.2023 and it is made clear that the parties shall appear before the Trial Court for continuation of proceedings without any further notice and the Trial Court shall proceed with the final decree proceedings, if an application for final decree is already pending and even if there is no application pending, proceed further without waiting for the parties to file any such application and effect the final division as per the preliminary decree and grant separate possession to the plaintiff.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON : 02.12.2022 PRONOUNCED ON : 19.12.2022 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.595 of 2016 Thiruselvam .. Appellant Vs. Chidambaram .. Respondent Prayer:...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published February 9, 2023

Justice anitha sumanth There was nothing that prevented the assessing officer to have called for objections, assigning a time limit to the assessee to file the same, and disposed the objections expeditiously. The procedure set out in the case of GKN Drive shafts (India) Ltd (supra) nowhere envisages modification/expansion of the statutory limitations under the Act. 28. In light of the detailed discussion as above as well as the legal position that has been settled in several judgments discussed in the preceding paragraphs, impugned notice under Section 148 dated 12.12.2019, order dated 23.07.2021 and reference to TPO on 24.11.2020 stand vitiated by non-issue of notice under Section 143(2) of the Act and the same are quashed. 29. These Writ Petitions are allowed. No costs. Connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 16.11.2022 Index : Yes Speaking Order sl To 1.Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, International Taxation Circle-1(1), BSNL Building, 4th Floor, No.16, Greams Road, Chennai-600 006. 2.Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Transfer Pricing Officer -1(1), BSNL Building, 5th Floor, No.16, Greams Road, Chennai-600 006. DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J. sl W.P.Nos.22661 & 22667 of 2021 and WMP.Nos.23902, 23903, 23904, 23907, 23908, 23909 & 23910 of 2021 & WMP.Nos.730, 731, 732 & 733 of 2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 16.11.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH W.P.Nos.22661 & 22667 of 2021 and WMP.Nos.23902, 23903, 23904, 23907, 23908, 23909 & 23910 of 2021 &...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.958 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 and C.M.P.No.20135 of 2021 Answers to the Issues : 20. In view of my answers to the questions, I find that the findings and conclusions reached by the Trial Court in respect of issue No.1, in the Original Suit, that the defendants 1 and 2 have borrowed a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- and Rs.3,00,000/- from the plaintiff on 15.06.1999 and 20.09.1999 respectively, as correct. I also concur with the Trial Court in answering issue No.2, in the Original Suit

Uncategorized

 by · Published February 8, 2023

HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.958 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 and C.M.P.No.20135 of 2021 Answers to the Issues : 20. In view of my answers to the questions, I find that the findings and conclusions reached by the Trial Court in respect of issue No.1, in the Original Suit, that the defendants 1 and 2 have borrowed a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- and Rs.3,00,000/- from the plaintiff on 15.06.1999 and 20.09.1999 respectively, as correct. I also concur with the Trial Court in answering issue No.2, in the Original Suit

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Judgment Reserved on : 09.11.2022 Judgment Pronounced on : 24.11.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.958 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 and C.M.P.No.20135...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
[2/8, 18:51] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: Today the members of Young Advocates Association along with their President Vignesh Arunachalam met and Greeted the Honble justice P.B.Balaji…. [2/8, 18:51] sekarreporter1: 🌹

Uncategorized

 by · Published February 8, 2023

[2/8, 18:51] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: Today the members of Young Advocates Association along with their President Vignesh Arunachalam met and Greeted the Honble justice P.B.Balaji…. [2/8, 18:51] sekarreporter1: 🌹

[2/8, 18:51] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: Today the members of Young Advocates Association along with their President Vignesh Arunachalam met and Greeted the Honble justice P.B.Balaji…. [2/8, 18:51] sekarreporter1: 🌹

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version