SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Daily Archive: August 18, 2022

ஆர்டர்லி முறையை ஒழிக்க தமிழக அரசு மற்றும் டிஜிப் எடுத்துள்ள நடவடிக்கைகள் வரவேற்கத்தகது என்று சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்ற நீதிபதி எஸ்.எம்.சுப்ரமணியம் பாராட்டு தெரிவித்துள்ளார். Aag kumaresan sgp s anitha harinath

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 18, 2022

ஆர்டர்லி முறையை ஒழிக்க தமிழக அரசு மற்றும் டிஜிப் எடுத்துள்ள நடவடிக்கைகள் வரவேற்கத்தகது என்று சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்ற நீதிபதி எஸ்.எம்.சுப்ரமணியம் பாராட்டு தெரிவித்துள்ளார். Aag kumaresan sgp s anitha harinath

ஆர்டர்லி முறையை ஒழிக்க தமிழக அரசு மற்றும் டிஜிப் எடுத்துள்ள நடவடிக்கைகள் வரவேற்கத்தகது என்று சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்ற நீதிபதி எஸ்.எம்.சுப்ரமணியம் பாராட்டு தெரிவித்துள்ளார். ்துறையில் பணியாற்றும் யு.மாணிக்கவேல் என்பவர் வேறு இடத்திற்கு இடமாற்றம் செய்யப்பட்டதையடுத்து, காவலர் குடியிருப்பில் அவருக்கு ஒதுக்கப்பட்ட வீட்டை காலி செய்யும்படி 2014ம்...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
ஆடர்லி நீதிபதிsms j  மீண்டும். சரமாரி கேள்ஙி [8/18, 10:54] Sekarreporter1: AAG kumaresan ssited by  special gp anitha says most of the orderlies have been taken back and that only essential orderlies are continuing until alternative arrangements are made. Says, deployment of five constables in the house of a police officer leads to Govt spending around Rs. 2.5 lakh per month.

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 18, 2022

ஆடர்லி நீதிபதிsms j  மீண்டும். சரமாரி கேள்ஙி [8/18, 10:54] Sekarreporter1: AAG kumaresan ssited by  special gp anitha says most of the orderlies have been taken back and that only essential orderlies are continuing until alternative arrangements are made. Says, deployment of five constables in the house of a police officer leads to Govt spending around Rs. 2.5 lakh per month.

[8/18, 10:53] Sekarreporter1: ஆடர்லி நீதிபதிsms j  மீண்டும். சரமாரி கேள்ஙி [8/18, 10:54] Sekarreporter1: AAG kumaresan ssited by  special gp anitha says most of the orderlies have been taken back and that only essential orderlies are...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
[8/18, 08:07] Sekarreporter1: https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/2022/08/18/8-18-0806-chandrasekar-mhc-advt-chandru-law-academyinviting-you-to-offline-online-coaching-forjudicial-examination-magistrate-munsifsubject-the-indian-constitution-1950-continuationdate/ [8/18, 08:07] Sekarreporter1: [8/18, 08:06] Chandrasekar Mhc Advt: *CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY* Inviting you to *OFFLINE / ONLINE coaching* for *JUDICIAL EXAMINATION/MAGISTRATE/ MUNSIF* *Subject: THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION, 1950* _(continuation)_ *Date : 18 AUGUST 2022* *Timing*: 10:45 am to 1:30 pm [8/18, 08:06] Sekarreporter1: 🌹

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 18, 2022

[8/18, 08:07] Sekarreporter1: https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/2022/08/18/8-18-0806-chandrasekar-mhc-advt-chandru-law-academyinviting-you-to-offline-online-coaching-forjudicial-examination-magistrate-munsifsubject-the-indian-constitution-1950-continuationdate/ [8/18, 08:07] Sekarreporter1: [8/18, 08:06] Chandrasekar Mhc Advt: *CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY* Inviting you to *OFFLINE / ONLINE coaching* for *JUDICIAL EXAMINATION/MAGISTRATE/ MUNSIF* *Subject: THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION, 1950* _(continuation)_ *Date : 18 AUGUST 2022* *Timing*: 10:45 am to 1:30 pm [8/18, 08:06] Sekarreporter1: 🌹

[8/18, 08:07] Sekarreporter1: https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/2022/08/18/8-18-0806-chandrasekar-mhc-advt-chandru-law-academyinviting-you-to-offline-online-coaching-forjudicial-examination-magistrate-munsifsubject-the-indian-constitution-1950-continuationdate/ [8/18, 08:07] Sekarreporter1: [8/18, 08:06] Chandrasekar Mhc Advt: *CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY* Inviting you to *OFFLINE / ONLINE coaching* for *JUDICIAL EXAMINATION/MAGISTRATE/ MUNSIF* *Subject: THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION, 1950* _(continuation)_ *Date :...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
 COMMON JUDGMENT D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARHY, J. The petitioner is an association registered under the Societies  Therefore, the present Writ Appeal and Writ Petitions are dismissed and we reiterate the earlier judgment in W.A.No.2895 of 2019, dated 28.08.2019. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, considering the fact that already in the earlier round, a sum of Rs.1,00,000/was imposed as costs, we refrain from imposing exemplary costs on the petitioner.  Consequently, C.M.P.No.2516 of 2022, W.M.P.Nos.12202 of 2021 and 3619 of 2021 are closed. (M.N.B., CJ)           (D.B.C., J.)                                                                     For  Appellant          : Mr.S.Selva Thirumurugan For Respondents : Mr.P.S.Raman, Senior Counsel   for Mr.Rahul Balaji, for R1 : M/s. Ramalingam & Associates, for R2 : Mrs.M.Sneha, for R3 In W.P.No.11467 of 2021 For Petitioner : Mr.S.Selva Thirumurugan For Respondents : Mr.B.Rabu Manohar,   Central Government Senior Panel Counsel   for R1 : Mr.P.Muthukumar,   State Government Pleader for RR-4 and 8 : Ms.Shubharanjani Ananth,   Standing Counsel for RR-2 and 3

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 18, 2022

 COMMON JUDGMENT D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARHY, J. The petitioner is an association registered under the Societies  Therefore, the present Writ Appeal and Writ Petitions are dismissed and we reiterate the earlier judgment in W.A.No.2895 of 2019, dated 28.08.2019. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, considering the fact that already in the earlier round, a sum of Rs.1,00,000/was imposed as costs, we refrain from imposing exemplary costs on the petitioner.  Consequently, C.M.P.No.2516 of 2022, W.M.P.Nos.12202 of 2021 and 3619 of 2021 are closed. (M.N.B., CJ)           (D.B.C., J.)                                                                     For  Appellant          : Mr.S.Selva Thirumurugan For Respondents : Mr.P.S.Raman, Senior Counsel   for Mr.Rahul Balaji, for R1 : M/s. Ramalingam & Associates, for R2 : Mrs.M.Sneha, for R3 In W.P.No.11467 of 2021 For Petitioner : Mr.S.Selva Thirumurugan For Respondents : Mr.B.Rabu Manohar,   Central Government Senior Panel Counsel   for R1 : Mr.P.Muthukumar,   State Government Pleader for RR-4 and 8 : Ms.Shubharanjani Ananth,   Standing Counsel for RR-2 and 3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Judgment reserved  on :  22.07.2022 Judgment delivered on :   16.08.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.A.No.324...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Therefore, We allow this Writ Appeal. We hold that the Writ Petition itself was not maintainable as there is an efficacious alternative remedy and also for non-joinder of necessary parties and therefore, stands dismissed, however, with liberty to the respondent herein to pursue the remedy of appeal, if it chooses to do so, in accordance with law. Consequently, C.M.P.No.11495 of 2022 is closed. (M.N.B., CJ)           (D.B.C., J.)                                                                                                                         16.08.2022  Index : Yes/No Speaking order/Non-speaking order grs Note: The original impugned order in one writ petition may be returned to the writ petitioner. THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARHY, J. grs W.A.No.1673 of 2022 16.08.2022. For  Appellants          : Mr.P.Muthukumar,   State Government Pleader   Assisted by Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan,   Government Advocate                                  For Respondent        : Mr.M.Palani JUDGMENT D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARHY, J.

Uncategorized

 by · Published August 18, 2022

Therefore, We allow this Writ Appeal. We hold that the Writ Petition itself was not maintainable as there is an efficacious alternative remedy and also for non-joinder of necessary parties and therefore, stands dismissed, however, with liberty to the respondent herein to pursue the remedy of appeal, if it chooses to do so, in accordance with law. Consequently, C.M.P.No.11495 of 2022 is closed. (M.N.B., CJ)           (D.B.C., J.)                                                                                                                         16.08.2022  Index : Yes/No Speaking order/Non-speaking order grs Note: The original impugned order in one writ petition may be returned to the writ petitioner. THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARHY, J. grs W.A.No.1673 of 2022 16.08.2022. For  Appellants          : Mr.P.Muthukumar,   State Government Pleader   Assisted by Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan,   Government Advocate                                  For Respondent        : Mr.M.Palani JUDGMENT D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARHY, J.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Judgment reserved  on :  04.08.2022 Judgment delivered on :  16.08.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.A.No.1673...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version