Follow:
- Next story THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU W.P.(MD) No.19811 of 2013 and M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2013 K.K.C.Balaganesan /vs./ 1.The Managing Director, Tamil nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited, Chennai. 24.The reason I come to this conclusion is clearly elucidated in the Preamble of the Act, which postulates that the democracy requires an informed citizenries and the Act was only to provide for furnishing of certain information to the citizen,
- Previous story Wife can give complaint against husband where she reside under 498A. Click to join whats app group https://chat.whatsapp.com/FFqajHblhdkFkswaolQ5mF
Recent Posts
- HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN C.M.A.(MD).No.671 of 2020 and C.M.P(MD).No.3598 of 2026 Umesh Nathan … Petitioner / Appellant Vs. R.Meenakshi … Respondent / Respondent
- Wla super function / congrars/ Wla Inaguration of Renovated creche by chief justice mhc Aravind Darmathikari/ eccellant speech /full function videos
- In the above circumstances, the writ petition is allowed. The second respondent is directed to provisionally release the consignment of roasted areca nut splits covered under Bill of
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL W.P.(MD)Nos.19539, 19658 and 20653 of 2026 and W.M.P.(MD)No.14536 of 2026 W.P.(MD)No.19539 of 2026:- Theeran Thirumurugan @ Thirumurugan … Petitioner vs. 1.The Chief Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009. 2.The Additional Chief Secretary, Human Resources Management Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009. 3.The Secretary, Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department, Government of
- [29/07, 18:30] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/Yec5PpotX4A?si=V6W8-1N1q_hounGO [29/07, 18:31] sekarreporter1: Mohamed Imranullah S.3m X During the hearing of a private case related to a wind energy firm before #MadrasHigh Court Senior Counsel J. Ravindran (former AAG) appeared for one side and Senior Counsel V. Raghavachari as well as Hasan Mohamed Jinnah (former State Public Prosecutor) appeared for the other party. J. Ravindran: Mr. Raghavachari and Mr. Jinnah have joined into an unholy alliance MiLords Justice G. Arul Murugan: We were also confused as to who’s appearing for whom
More
Recent Posts
- HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN C.M.A.(MD).No.671 of 2020 and C.M.P(MD).No.3598 of 2026 Umesh Nathan … Petitioner / Appellant Vs. R.Meenakshi … Respondent / Respondent
- Wla super function / congrars/ Wla Inaguration of Renovated creche by chief justice mhc Aravind Darmathikari/ eccellant speech /full function videos
- In the above circumstances, the writ petition is allowed. The second respondent is directed to provisionally release the consignment of roasted areca nut splits covered under Bill of
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL W.P.(MD)Nos.19539, 19658 and 20653 of 2026 and W.M.P.(MD)No.14536 of 2026 W.P.(MD)No.19539 of 2026:- Theeran Thirumurugan @ Thirumurugan … Petitioner vs. 1.The Chief Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009. 2.The Additional Chief Secretary, Human Resources Management Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009. 3.The Secretary, Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department, Government of
- [29/07, 18:30] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/Yec5PpotX4A?si=V6W8-1N1q_hounGO [29/07, 18:31] sekarreporter1: Mohamed Imranullah S.3m X During the hearing of a private case related to a wind energy firm before #MadrasHigh Court Senior Counsel J. Ravindran (former AAG) appeared for one side and Senior Counsel V. Raghavachari as well as Hasan Mohamed Jinnah (former State Public Prosecutor) appeared for the other party. J. Ravindran: Mr. Raghavachari and Mr. Jinnah have joined into an unholy alliance MiLords Justice G. Arul Murugan: We were also confused as to who’s appearing for whom