You may also like...
-
Justice Anita Samanth delivered the order based on a writ petition filed by M/s. Davinci Leather Pvt. Ltd. The court said that the error in not stating ‘YES’ to availing of the Scheme, such error, admittedly being inadvertent and Mr.Rajinish Pathiyil fairly does not dispute this, should not stand in the way of the consideration of entitlement on merits. While allowing the writ petition said that entitlement itself is concerned, the court has already observed that the benefit of the Scheme would be available to the petitioner conditional upon verification and acceptance of such claim by the DGFT.
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 4, 2020
-
உயர் நீதி மன்றம் வழக்கறிஞர் திரு.s. துரைசாமி, அவரது பண்ணை வீட்டில், அவரை சந்தித்த காணொளி.
by Sekar Reporter · Published June 7, 2020
-