[12/10, 07:53] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1336858953901199366?s=08 [12/10, 07:53] Sekarreporter1: https://www.taxscan.in/transfer-order-is-administrative-order-and-not-quasi-judicial-order-assessee-dont-have-any-right-to-choose-assessing-authority-madras-hc/87967/

by Sekar Reporter · December 10, 2020

[12/10, 07:53] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1336858953901199366?s=08
[12/10, 07:53] Sekarreporter1: https://www.taxscan.in/transfer-order-is-administrative-order-and-not-quasi-judicial-order-assessee-dont-have-any-right-to-choose-assessing-authority-madras-hc/87967/

Share this post:

Share on X (Twitter) Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on Email

You may also like...

• 

  Former minister sp velumani case full order. THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.N. PRAKASH and THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RMT. TEEKAA RAMAN W.P. No.34845 of 2018 and Crl.O.P. Nos.23428 of 2018 and 21564 and 21565 of 2022 and connected Miscellaneous Petitions W.P. No.34845 of 2018 Arappor Iyakkam COMMON ORDER P.N. PRAKASH, J. In view of the commonality of the facts, the decision in the four cases at hand, viz., W.P. No.34845 of 2018 and Crl.O.P. Nos.23428 of 2018 and 21564 and 21565 of 2022, will be governed by this common order.

  November 30, 2022

   by Sekar Reporter · Published November 30, 2022

• 

  306 ipc FIR quashed J.B.PARDIWALA] ……………….J. [K.V. VISWANATHAN]

  November 5, 2025

   by Sekar Reporter · Published November 5, 2025

• 

  Justices M. Sathyanarayanan and M. Nirmal Kumar refused to entertain the petition after Chevanan Mohan, counsel for RBI, told the court that it was for the Centre and the apex bank to take a call on issues having financial implications and not for courts to issue directions.

  April 24, 2020

   by Sekar Reporter · Published April 24, 2020