You may also like...
-
P.N. Prakash, J. Crl.R.C. Nos. 819 to 822 of 2013. D/d. 24.01.2020.Dishonour of Cheque – Complainant is not required to prove the debt – However, the complainant is required to plead about the existence of the debt in the complaint. Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 – Dishonour of Cheque – Presumption under sections 118 and 139 – Complainant is not required to prove the debtHeard Mr. R. Sankarappan, learned counsel for the accused and Mr. M. Arvind Kumar, learned counsel for the complainant.
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 9, 2020
-
TH HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction) W.P. No. of 2026 M/s. KVN PRODUCTIONS LLP, Represented by its AuthorizedSignatory, Mr. Venkata Narayana Konanki at Door No 9, Ranjit Road, Kotturpuram, Adayar, K.B. Dasan Road, Alwarpet, Chennai – 600020 … Petitioner VS 1. Central Board of Film Certification, Films Division Complex, Phase – I Building, 9th Floor, Dr. G. Deshmukh Marg, Mumbai – 400 026 2. The Regional Officer, Central Board of Film Certification
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 6, 2026
-