ஜாய் கிரிசில்டா குழந்தைக்கு நான் தான் தந்தை” – உண்மையை ஒப்புக்கொண்ட மாதம்பட்டி ரங்கராஜ்
[04/11, 15:13] Sekarreporter:
[04/11, 15:23] Sekarreporter: ஜாய் கிரிசில்டா குழந்தைக்கு நான் தான் தந்தை” – உண்மையை ஒப்புக்கொண்ட மாதம்பட்டி ரங்கராஜ்
Follow:
- Next story வீரப்பன் விவகாரம் தமிழக அரசு மீது ஐகோர்ட் அதிருப்தி
- Previous story Judge kk Ramakrishnan /Condoning 32-year delay by Tamil Nadu government in filing an appeal in a land dispute case, the Madras High Court said that public interest is paramount and if it shown that the public interest has suffered due to fraud, the court could use its discretionary power to condone delay.
Recent Posts
- Home / Court Updates / High Courts / Madras High Court Criminal Law Cannot Be Set In Motion Against Every Husband’s Relative Merely Due To Matrimonial Discord: Madras High Court Quashes Case U/S 498A IPC Against In-Laws The Court said that “the criminal process must remain a shield for the genuinely aggrieved and not become a sword for collateral vengeance”. ByAgatha Shukla|14 June 2026 10:00 AM Justice L. Victoria Gowri, Madras High Court, Madurai Bench The Madras High Court, Madurai Bench has quashed criminal proceedings under Section 498A IPC against the relatives of a husband, observing that matrimonial disputes cannot become a basis to prosecute every family member without specific allegations of cruelty or overt acts. while partly allowing a petition filed by the accused persons, the Bench held that expressions such as relatives “supported” the husband or caused “mental cruelty” are insufficient to attract criminal liability. The Court observed that criminal prosecution cannot be continued merely on the basis of relationship with the husband. Justice L. Victoria Gowri observed, “The mere use of expressions such as ‘supported him’ or ‘in-laws caused mental cruelty’ cannot by itself constitute an offence under Section 498-A IPC. Criminal prosecution cannot be allowed to proceed on the basis of relationship alone. Therefore, the proceedings under Section 498-A IPC deserve to be quashed insofar as petitioners 2 to 7 and 10 are concerned”. https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/x-v-the-state-of-tamil-nadu-crlopmdno2451-of-2024-every-husbands-relative-merely-due-to-matrimonial-discord-1615868
- Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari + Justice G. Arul Murugan_. *PIL Misuse + Temple + Bus Stand + Planning Decisions + Unsubstantiated Pleas*. *HJS PIL Jurisprudence, UPSC GS-2*
- http://youtube.com/post/UgkxPIbYc66l3HQRKY91GWTK2P6QQ6GePTFk?si=Q_Zu7fkSNDAlpjzF [14/06, 08:07] sekarreporter1: TAMIL NADU STATE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY Date: 13.06.2026 PRESS RELEASE As per the guidance of the Hon’ble Chief Justice, Madras High Court/Patronin-Chief, Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority
- HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALA S.A.(MD).No.651 of 2010 1.Varghese [Died] 2.Rani 3.Sahaya Chandran 4.Sasi Malar 5.Arul Solan 6.Mary Sabitha 7.Sasi Ajitha … Plaintiffs / Appellants **Appellants 2 to 7
- http://youtube.com/post/UgkxhTt9iFrdiWloeVBaepRRz981NkGL73Lp?si=2QWKNJbUWRcJZZrm [13/06, 21:21] sekarreporter1: TAMIL NADU STATE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY Date: 13.06.2026 PRESS RELEASE As per the guidance of the Hon’ble Chief Justice, Madras High Court/Patronin-Chief, Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority (TNSLSA), and as per the directions of the Hon’ble Executive Chairman, Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority, this Authority had
More
Recent Posts
- Home / Court Updates / High Courts / Madras High Court Criminal Law Cannot Be Set In Motion Against Every Husband’s Relative Merely Due To Matrimonial Discord: Madras High Court Quashes Case U/S 498A IPC Against In-Laws The Court said that “the criminal process must remain a shield for the genuinely aggrieved and not become a sword for collateral vengeance”. ByAgatha Shukla|14 June 2026 10:00 AM Justice L. Victoria Gowri, Madras High Court, Madurai Bench The Madras High Court, Madurai Bench has quashed criminal proceedings under Section 498A IPC against the relatives of a husband, observing that matrimonial disputes cannot become a basis to prosecute every family member without specific allegations of cruelty or overt acts. while partly allowing a petition filed by the accused persons, the Bench held that expressions such as relatives “supported” the husband or caused “mental cruelty” are insufficient to attract criminal liability. The Court observed that criminal prosecution cannot be continued merely on the basis of relationship with the husband. Justice L. Victoria Gowri observed, “The mere use of expressions such as ‘supported him’ or ‘in-laws caused mental cruelty’ cannot by itself constitute an offence under Section 498-A IPC. Criminal prosecution cannot be allowed to proceed on the basis of relationship alone. Therefore, the proceedings under Section 498-A IPC deserve to be quashed insofar as petitioners 2 to 7 and 10 are concerned”. https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/x-v-the-state-of-tamil-nadu-crlopmdno2451-of-2024-every-husbands-relative-merely-due-to-matrimonial-discord-1615868
- Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari + Justice G. Arul Murugan_. *PIL Misuse + Temple + Bus Stand + Planning Decisions + Unsubstantiated Pleas*. *HJS PIL Jurisprudence, UPSC GS-2*
- http://youtube.com/post/UgkxPIbYc66l3HQRKY91GWTK2P6QQ6GePTFk?si=Q_Zu7fkSNDAlpjzF [14/06, 08:07] sekarreporter1: TAMIL NADU STATE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY Date: 13.06.2026 PRESS RELEASE As per the guidance of the Hon’ble Chief Justice, Madras High Court/Patronin-Chief, Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority
- HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALA S.A.(MD).No.651 of 2010 1.Varghese [Died] 2.Rani 3.Sahaya Chandran 4.Sasi Malar 5.Arul Solan 6.Mary Sabitha 7.Sasi Ajitha … Plaintiffs / Appellants **Appellants 2 to 7
- http://youtube.com/post/UgkxhTt9iFrdiWloeVBaepRRz981NkGL73Lp?si=2QWKNJbUWRcJZZrm [13/06, 21:21] sekarreporter1: TAMIL NADU STATE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY Date: 13.06.2026 PRESS RELEASE As per the guidance of the Hon’ble Chief Justice, Madras High Court/Patronin-Chief, Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority (TNSLSA), and as per the directions of the Hon’ble Executive Chairman, Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority, this Authority had