You may also like...
-
justices M Sathyanarayanan and P Rajamanickam stated that the litigant has not submitted any materials to support his claim that only a Kallar community member should have been appointed in the above post. They also pointed out that it is a service portfolio case and not a PIL and the litigant, despite being a practising advocate and a registered political party member, had not paid attention to the fact. Criticising the litigant for wasting the court’s time, the judge dismissed the PIL and directed the litigant to pay Rs 10,000 as cost to any one Kallar Reclamation school of his choice within two weeks.
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 1, 2020
-
[2/17, 18:48] Sekarreporter: WP 3782 of 2020 filed by V.V.Swaminathan came up for hearing today. SGP M.Karthikeyan appeared on behalf of HR&CE and defended. The Hon’ble Court dismissed the Writ Petition rejecting the grounds raised by the petitioner. Hon’ble Court held that present hereditary trusteeship was valid and same is also under supervision of a Deputy Commissioner of HR&CE department, therefore there is no need of interference from the Court. Secondly, the loss of the Rajaraja cholan statue is under investigation by appropriate authorities and therefore there is no need for interference from the Court. [2/17, 18:48] Sekarreporter: 💐👍
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 18, 2020
-
SHOULD “KOVILPATTI KADALAI MITTAI” MADE MANDATORY IN MGR NUTRITIOUS MEAL PROGRAMME & MIDDAY MEAL SCHEME BY STATE AND CENTRAL GOVERNMENT? – AUTHOR: MUSKAN DOSAR “On behalf of IPR Attorney Association, I request state of Tamil Nadu and central government is to include Kovilpatti Kadalai Mittai in the in the state of Tamil Nadu under the scheme of PURATCHI THALAIVAR MGR – NUTRITIOUS MEAL PROGRAMME and
by Sekar Reporter · Published June 18, 2020