Follow:
- Next story THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN W.P. (MD).No.12969 of 2014 full orderHence, I find that the order of compulsory retirement passed by the third respondent is found to be on par with the proved charges. 35. In the result, this Writ Petition is dismissed. However, in view of the discussion in the preceding paragraphs and in exercise of powers conferred upon this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, I hereby direct the Secretary, Home Department to issue necessary instructions. [i] To ensure the fair trial in Criminal Cases and Sessions Cases where the police officials and officer of uniformed service were arrayed as accused to review the case and to file necessary application before the Principal Bench or before the Madurai Bench of this Court for transfer of the trial of those cases to the nearby District Sessions Court so as to enable the private prosecution witnesses and independent witnesses to depose without any fear or influence of the local persons to depose the fact known to them in connection with the charges in the Court of law in the larger interest of justice. No costs. 01.02.2021
- Previous story THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN W.P. (MD).No.12969 of 2014 R.Senthilnathan .. Petitioner .. Vs .. 1. The Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, Chennai – 4.[i] To ensure the fair trial in Criminal Cases and Sessions Cases where the police officials and officer of uniformed service were arrayed as accused to review the case and to file necessary application before the Principal Bench or before the Madurai Bench of this Court for transfer
Recent Posts
- CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRL.O.P.No.17359 of 2026 1. Sureshkumar 2. Narayanan ..Petitioners Vs. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Civil Supplies CID, Chennai. Crime No.149 of 2025 ..Respondent
- 15.With the above observations, the impugned order dated 20.09.2023 passed in W.P.No.4228 of 2020 is set aside and the writ appeal stands allowed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed. [S.M.S., J.] [N.S., J.]
- The Second Appeals stand Partly Allowed. The defendants 2 and 3 are entitled to 1/12 share each in the suit property. The plaintiff and the 4th defendant are/HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR S.A.Nos.601, 612 and 614 of 2023 and C.M.P.Nos.19260, 19344 and 19365 of 2023 Lakshmana Gounder (Since Deceased) 1.Sengottaiyan 2.Krishnan 3.Mani … Appellants
- http://youtube.com/post/UgkxNd-kPNaPuZeUpk3uJnY2icCzwBDluPN3?si=wfT5eBnznWbRgir_ [20/07, 13:07] sekarreporter1: Partition Suit Pending Till Final Decree Can Account For Birth & Death Of Sharers: Madras High Court The Madras High Court partly allowed second appeals in a partition dispute after holding that the death of a sharer pending the first appeal had to be accounted for before final partition by metes and bounds.
- Judge Anand Venkadesh order to prepare seniority list
More
Recent Posts
- CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRL.O.P.No.17359 of 2026 1. Sureshkumar 2. Narayanan ..Petitioners Vs. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Civil Supplies CID, Chennai. Crime No.149 of 2025 ..Respondent
- 15.With the above observations, the impugned order dated 20.09.2023 passed in W.P.No.4228 of 2020 is set aside and the writ appeal stands allowed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed. [S.M.S., J.] [N.S., J.]
- The Second Appeals stand Partly Allowed. The defendants 2 and 3 are entitled to 1/12 share each in the suit property. The plaintiff and the 4th defendant are/HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR S.A.Nos.601, 612 and 614 of 2023 and C.M.P.Nos.19260, 19344 and 19365 of 2023 Lakshmana Gounder (Since Deceased) 1.Sengottaiyan 2.Krishnan 3.Mani … Appellants
- http://youtube.com/post/UgkxNd-kPNaPuZeUpk3uJnY2icCzwBDluPN3?si=wfT5eBnznWbRgir_ [20/07, 13:07] sekarreporter1: Partition Suit Pending Till Final Decree Can Account For Birth & Death Of Sharers: Madras High Court The Madras High Court partly allowed second appeals in a partition dispute after holding that the death of a sharer pending the first appeal had to be accounted for before final partition by metes and bounds.
- Judge Anand Venkadesh order to prepare seniority list