Follow:
- Next story Setting aside the Thanjavur collector’s order which rejected an arbitration application on the ground that it was filed outside the prescribed period, the Madras high court held that there is no time limit specified for applying before the arbitrator under the National Highways Act, 1956. Justice S S Sundar observed that even otherwise if the Limitation Act, 1963, was applied in the case, the period prescribed under section 137, which is applicable in the present case, the appeal was filed well before time. “From the facts of the case in hand, this court is satisfied that the appeal had been filed within the prescribed time. Hence, this court has no hesitation to hold that the order passed by the collector dismissing the appeal on the ground of limitation is not only illegal on accounts of the judgements of the earlier division bench of this court, but also by accepting the case of the collector regarding application of Limitation Act,” observed the judge.
- Previous story The Madurai Bench of Madras High Courtheld that registered person making zero rated supply shall be eligible to claim IGSTrefunds, irrespective of the circular on clarifications on exports related refund issues (Circular No.37/2018-Customs, dated 09.10.2018). The ruling was made by a single bench consisting of Justice M.Govindaraj, in the case of M/s.Precot Meridian Limited v. The Commissioner of Customs and Anr.
Recent Posts
- S m subramaniyam judge order /District Superintendent of Police. In the event of receiving any complaint regarding illegal mining operations, violation of the Act and the Rules, excess quarry etc., the Commissioner of Geology and Mines, the District Superintendent of Police and the District Collector, are bound to conduct a detailed investigation inquiry under the provisions of the Act and the Rules, and prosecute all persons apart from initiation of disciplinary actions against the officials, who all are responsible and accountable for illegal mining operations. The petitioner is at liberty to submit representations along with all necessary details to the officials. 18. With the above directions, the present writ petition stands disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. 15-04-2024Index : Yes/NoInternet: Yes/NoSpeaking order/Non-Speaking orderNeutral Citation : Yes/NoSvn
- Chief Justice Sanjay V. Gangapurwala and Justice J. Sathya Narayana Prasad on Thursday. Tirunelveli-based advocate S. Veilumuthu had filed the case accusing the CMDA PRO of having disseminated to the media an election related political news through his official e-mail address.
- Thiru.Dayanidhi Maran, (Male/Age 57 Yrs)S/o Late Thiru. Murasoli MaranNo.3, First Avenue,Boat Club Raja Annamalaipuram,Chennai-600028 …Complainant-Vs- Edapadi.palanisamy /complaint copy/
- today 9 law tips Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) DRTC 56 : naveed Ahmed vs koppa & another : An order being an authoritative direction , injunction or mandate , it is decision of a court or judge made or entered in writing , it should necessarily contain reasons ( Rule 12 ( 4) debt recovery tribunal ( procedure ) rules 1993
- வாக்காளர்களுக்கு எந்த வகையில் லஞ்சம் கொடுத்தாலும், அது அரசியலமைப்பு, ஜனநாயகத்தின் கட்டமைப்பை தகர்த்துவிடும் என உயர் நீதிமன்ற மதுரைக் கிளை judge pugalenthi எச்சரிக்கை/ mukesh reporter
More
Recent Posts
- S m subramaniyam judge order /District Superintendent of Police. In the event of receiving any complaint regarding illegal mining operations, violation of the Act and the Rules, excess quarry etc., the Commissioner of Geology and Mines, the District Superintendent of Police and the District Collector, are bound to conduct a detailed investigation inquiry under the provisions of the Act and the Rules, and prosecute all persons apart from initiation of disciplinary actions against the officials, who all are responsible and accountable for illegal mining operations. The petitioner is at liberty to submit representations along with all necessary details to the officials. 18. With the above directions, the present writ petition stands disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. 15-04-2024Index : Yes/NoInternet: Yes/NoSpeaking order/Non-Speaking orderNeutral Citation : Yes/NoSvn
- Chief Justice Sanjay V. Gangapurwala and Justice J. Sathya Narayana Prasad on Thursday. Tirunelveli-based advocate S. Veilumuthu had filed the case accusing the CMDA PRO of having disseminated to the media an election related political news through his official e-mail address.
- Thiru.Dayanidhi Maran, (Male/Age 57 Yrs)S/o Late Thiru. Murasoli MaranNo.3, First Avenue,Boat Club Raja Annamalaipuram,Chennai-600028 …Complainant-Vs- Edapadi.palanisamy /complaint copy/
- today 9 law tips Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) DRTC 56 : naveed Ahmed vs koppa & another : An order being an authoritative direction , injunction or mandate , it is decision of a court or judge made or entered in writing , it should necessarily contain reasons ( Rule 12 ( 4) debt recovery tribunal ( procedure ) rules 1993
- வாக்காளர்களுக்கு எந்த வகையில் லஞ்சம் கொடுத்தாலும், அது அரசியலமைப்பு, ஜனநாயகத்தின் கட்டமைப்பை தகர்த்துவிடும் என உயர் நீதிமன்ற மதுரைக் கிளை judge pugalenthi எச்சரிக்கை/ mukesh reporter