டாஸ்மாக் ed case sc dismissed mhc order upheld

by Sekar Reporter · November 17, 2025

[17/11, 14:31] Sekarreporter:

[17/11, 15:02] Sekarreporter:

Share this post:

Share on X (Twitter) Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on Email

You may also like...

• 

  Accordingly, this appeal stands allowed by setting aside the order impugned in the writ petition as well as in this appeal. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (R.M.D., J.) (J.S.N.P., J. Appellant : Mr.Nithyesh and Vaibhav For Mr.Palani Selvaraj For Respondents : Mr. A.P. Srinivas Senior Panel Counsel (Income Tax) JUDGMENT R.MAHADEVAN,J. )

  July 19, 2022

   by Sekar Reporter · Published July 19, 2022

• 

  Full order ofTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH WP.No.19949  and 19203 of 2021 in WMP Nos.21203, 21204, 21206, 20492, 20493, 20495 of 2021 S.Thirumoorthy       …Petitioner in WP No. 19949 of 2021 P.Tamilselvi                 …Petitioner in WP No.19203 of 2021—For Petitioners        : Mr.A.E.Lakshmi Narayanan For Respondents : Mrs.P.J.Anitha, Central Government Standing counsel for R1 in WP No.19949 of 2021.   Mr.M.R.Murugesan Central Government Standing counsel for R1 in WP No.19203 of 2021.   Mr.Haja Nazurudeen   Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.U.Baranidharan,   Government Advocate for   R2 to R6 in both WPs                         COMMON

  October 8, 2021

   by Sekar Reporter · Published October 8, 2021

• 

  _Justice M. Satyanarayanan and P.Rajamanikam_ has observed that *mere preparation of charge memo is not sufficient and unless the charge memo is issued to the concerned employee, the disciplinary proceedings cannot be said to have commenced or pending.* Further directed the Govt to promote the Writ Petitioner S. Parthasarathy as *Special Grade Municipal Commissioner

  September 1, 2020

   by Sekar Reporter · Published September 1, 2020