டாஸ்மாக் கிராமசபை வழக்கு for petner s Prabakaran senior advt and k balu argued before Cj full.bench
டாஸ்மாக் கிராமசபை வழக்கு for petner s Prabakaran senior advt and k balu argued before Cj full.bench ag gp argued. Case posted April. Month
Follow:
- Next story N.KIRUBAKARAN, J and R.PONGIAPPAN, J order regarding Advocates and bar council read full order advt Jothimani argued for TN bar council
- Previous story [2/27, 18:15] Chanduru Adv: The First Bench has directed the Government to frame guidelines for empanelment of Eminent Senior Advocates to conduct trial under the SC& ST Prevention of Atrocities Act cases for the victims as per Rule 4(5) of the SC ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Rules 1995 .. The District Magistrates shall follow the same and Principal District Judges shall be involved. It will be of great help to victims.🙏🏻 [2/27, 18:17] Sekarreporter 1: 🍁🍁
Recent Posts
- Head notes /M Ravi Advocate / A) Tamil Nadu Civil Service (Disciplinary and Appeal) Rules, 1955 – Rule 17(b) – Tamil Nadu Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1973 – Delay in disciplinary proceedings – Petitioner, a Village Administrative Officer, was dismissed after a decade-long delay in proceedings for alleged irregularities in land issuance – The court found the delay prejudicial and discriminatory, as co-delinquents faced lesser penalties – The court emphasized the need for timely resolution in disciplinary matters. (Paras 3, 4, 25, 27
- Kanadasan son case mhc order
- Justice Mrs.Mala as Item No.24. Where Senior Advocate and Former State PP Mr.A.Natarajan appeared for the son of Kaviarasu Kannadhasan and sought the court intervention against the rejection order passed by Tamil Nadu EB department, who refused to provide EB connection
- Justice J Sathya Narayana Prasad directed MTC to refund Rs 25,200 and clear all pending retirement dues with 6% annual interest.”
- கிறிஸ்துவ மத போதகர் ஜாமீன் கோரி
More
Recent Posts
- Head notes /M Ravi Advocate / A) Tamil Nadu Civil Service (Disciplinary and Appeal) Rules, 1955 – Rule 17(b) – Tamil Nadu Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1973 – Delay in disciplinary proceedings – Petitioner, a Village Administrative Officer, was dismissed after a decade-long delay in proceedings for alleged irregularities in land issuance – The court found the delay prejudicial and discriminatory, as co-delinquents faced lesser penalties – The court emphasized the need for timely resolution in disciplinary matters. (Paras 3, 4, 25, 27
- Kanadasan son case mhc order
- Justice Mrs.Mala as Item No.24. Where Senior Advocate and Former State PP Mr.A.Natarajan appeared for the son of Kaviarasu Kannadhasan and sought the court intervention against the rejection order passed by Tamil Nadu EB department, who refused to provide EB connection
- Justice J Sathya Narayana Prasad directed MTC to refund Rs 25,200 and clear all pending retirement dues with 6% annual interest.”
- கிறிஸ்துவ மத போதகர் ஜாமீன் கோரி
