Wla president interview opening chamber
https://youtu.be/401EWX01a6U
![10/14, 06:14] Adhilashmi Logomoorthy: McGan Law Firm, cordially invite you for the inaugural function of Jaipur Foot camp, to be held at Periyar Thidal, on 14.10.22 from 4.30pm to 6.30 pm, presided over by our Acting Hon’ble Chief Justice. Thiru.T.Raja,Madras High Court.](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story [3/9, 17:41] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1369259422497730560?s=08 [3/9, 17:41] Sekarreporter1: Sitting from right to left: Justices M. Sathyanarayanan, R. Pongiappan, P. Rajamanickam, N. Kirubakaran and V. Bharathidasan of Madras High Court took COVID-19 vaccine at TN Govt Multi Super Speciality Hospital at Omandurar Govt Estate in Chennai. @THChennai https://t.co/jxVwYbKmuh
- Previous story Coal tender case cj bench directed to list the case on thrusday
Recent Posts
- CRP 5201/2024 Judgment of Hon’ble Justice N.Mala J dated 26.3.2026 Counsel for the Petitioner : Ms. Gopika Nambiar Counsel for the Respondent : Mr.Ralph V Manohar A Civil Revision Petition is maintainable as against the dismissal of an application seeking leave to defend in a summary suit. The parties need not be relegated to file an appeal. This proposition holds good even if a decree has already been passed in the summary suit. The Court arrived at this conclusion by relying upon the judgment in Shivsu Canadian Clear
- 08/06, 18:21] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxoQDxXLEVS-ZnR4HYwS8vylYkS9CRTc3U?si=mLRj06CRrh4qVty- [08/06, 18:21] sekarreporter1: CRP 5201/2024 Judgment of Hon’ble Justice N.Mala J dated 26.3.2026 Counsel for the Petitioner : Ms. Gopika Nambiar Counsel for the Respondent : Mr.Ralph V Manohar
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI C.M.A.No.2062 of 2025 and C.M.P.No.18113 of 2025 Sarkar Syed Habibullah Sha Kahdari Arif Rabbani Hazarat Dargha, Rep. By its Mutawalli, M.Mohammed Azmathulaah, S/o. Mahamed Qutharothulla, Flat No.3,2nd Floor, No.89/149, Llyods Road, Royapetta, Chennai-600 014. …Appellant Vs. 1.The Tamil Nadu Waqf Board, Represented by its Chairman,
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI C.M.A.No.2062 of 2025 and C.M.P.No.18113 of 2025 Sarkar Syed Habibullah Sha Kahdari Arif Rabbani Hazarat Dargha, Rep. By its Mutawalli, M.Mohammed Azmathulaah, S/o. Mahamed Qutharothulla, Flat No.3,2nd Floor, No.89/149, Llyods Road, Royapetta, Chennai-600 014. …Appellant Vs. 1.The Tamil Nadu Waqf Board, Represented by its Chairman,
- *Mere existence of Dargah does not make land a Waqf property: Madras High Court* The Court said the Waqf Board cannot assume automatic control over a Dargah unless the property is legally established as Waqf. https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/mere-existence-of-dargah-does-not-make-land-a-waqf-property-madras-high-court
More
Recent Posts
- CRP 5201/2024 Judgment of Hon’ble Justice N.Mala J dated 26.3.2026 Counsel for the Petitioner : Ms. Gopika Nambiar Counsel for the Respondent : Mr.Ralph V Manohar A Civil Revision Petition is maintainable as against the dismissal of an application seeking leave to defend in a summary suit. The parties need not be relegated to file an appeal. This proposition holds good even if a decree has already been passed in the summary suit. The Court arrived at this conclusion by relying upon the judgment in Shivsu Canadian Clear
- 08/06, 18:21] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxoQDxXLEVS-ZnR4HYwS8vylYkS9CRTc3U?si=mLRj06CRrh4qVty- [08/06, 18:21] sekarreporter1: CRP 5201/2024 Judgment of Hon’ble Justice N.Mala J dated 26.3.2026 Counsel for the Petitioner : Ms. Gopika Nambiar Counsel for the Respondent : Mr.Ralph V Manohar
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI C.M.A.No.2062 of 2025 and C.M.P.No.18113 of 2025 Sarkar Syed Habibullah Sha Kahdari Arif Rabbani Hazarat Dargha, Rep. By its Mutawalli, M.Mohammed Azmathulaah, S/o. Mahamed Qutharothulla, Flat No.3,2nd Floor, No.89/149, Llyods Road, Royapetta, Chennai-600 014. …Appellant Vs. 1.The Tamil Nadu Waqf Board, Represented by its Chairman,
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI C.M.A.No.2062 of 2025 and C.M.P.No.18113 of 2025 Sarkar Syed Habibullah Sha Kahdari Arif Rabbani Hazarat Dargha, Rep. By its Mutawalli, M.Mohammed Azmathulaah, S/o. Mahamed Qutharothulla, Flat No.3,2nd Floor, No.89/149, Llyods Road, Royapetta, Chennai-600 014. …Appellant Vs. 1.The Tamil Nadu Waqf Board, Represented by its Chairman,
- *Mere existence of Dargah does not make land a Waqf property: Madras High Court* The Court said the Waqf Board cannot assume automatic control over a Dargah unless the property is legally established as Waqf. https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/mere-existence-of-dargah-does-not-make-land-a-waqf-property-madras-high-court