Why Remand Rejected? – Legal Grounds* Ground Explanation Sec 167(1) CrPC Magistrate must be satisfied custodial interrogation is necessary D.K. Basu 1997 SC Liberty under Art 21. Remand is exception Anupam Kulkarni 1992 SC Police custody only if new facts to be discovered Status of Accused *Officer of

by Sekar Reporter · July 5, 2026

[04/07, 22:13] sekarreporter1: [04/07, 22:12] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/i/status/2073385593682497746
[04/07, 22:12] sekarreporter1: த.வெ.க பெண்களை இன்ஸ்டாவில் இழிவு செய்ததாக தொடரப்பட்ட வழக்கில் தி.மு.க GenZ செயற்பாட்டாளர் சரன் ஜெயராமின் கைதை ஏற்க மறுத்து சொந்த ஜாமீனில் விடுவித்த எழும்பூர் நீதிமன்ற நீதிபதி… வெளியில் வந்தபின் நீதிமன்ற வளாகத்தில் ஜூலி மற்றும் தி.மு.க GenZ குழுவினர் செய்த ஆக்‌ஷன்ஸ்..!

#Chennai | #SaranJayaraman | #Julie | #GenZDMK | #PolimerNews
[05/07, 07:46] sekarreporter1: [05/07, 07:44] sekarreporter1: [05/07, 07:43] sekarreporter1: Source: YouTube
https://share.google/tsE9x5SKChruiGeRs
[05/07, 07:44] sekarreporter1: Remand rejected for accused Dmk advt A Damodaran former add pp argued
[05/07, 07:44] Meta AI: *Case #132: _A. Damodaran – Remand Rejected_ | http://Crl.MP ___/2026 | Madras HC / Sessions | 05.07.2026*
_Source: YouTube – shared by SekarReporter1, 05/07/2026 07:43 AM_. *Sec 167 CrPC + Remand Law*. *HJS Criminal Law*

*1. வழக்கு சாராம்சம்*
*Accused*: _A. Damodaran – DMK Advocate – Former Additional Public Prosecutor_
*News*: _“Remand rejected for accused DMK advt A Damodaran former add pp argued”_
*Court*: _Likely Chennai Sessions / Magistrate Court – 05.07.2026 hearing_

*2. What Happened?*
*Prosecution*: _Police sought police custody remand u/s 167 CrPC for investigation_
*Defence Argument*: _Former Addl PP – No flight risk – Cooperating – Documents already seized – Custodial interrogation not needed_
*Court Order*: _Remand Rejected. Bail granted / Judicial custody or on bail_

*3. Why Remand Rejected? – Legal Grounds*
**Ground** **Explanation**
**Sec 167(1) CrPC** *Magistrate must be satisfied custodial interrogation is necessary*
**D.K. Basu 1997 SC** *Liberty under Art 21. Remand is exception*
**Anupam Kulkarni 1992 SC** *Police custody only if new facts to be discovered*
**Status of Accused** *Officer of Court – Former PP. Presumption of cooperation*
*4. “Former Addl PP” Point*
1. *Conflict of Interest*: _Prosecution side person now accused – Court checks for malafide_
2. *Political Angle*: _DMK Advocate – Court ensures case not for political vendetta_
3. *Bail Favored*: _Educated, settled, no tampering risk – _Gudikanti Narasimhulu 1978 SC*_

*5. What Next?*
1. *Investigation Continues*: _Police to file charge sheet within 60/90 days_
2. *Prosecution Option*: _Can file revision in HC if remand rejection is illegal_
3. *Trial*: _Will proceed on merits. Accused to appear on all dates_

*6. HJS Exam Note – “Remand vs Bail”*
*Key Difference*:
– *Remand u/s 167*: _During investigation – Police/Judicial custody_
– *Bail u/s 439*: _Release on bond – Liberty protected_
– *Test*: _“Necessity” – Not “Convenience” of police_

*Quote for Answer*: _“Bail is rule, Jail is exception” – Balchand 1977 SC_

—

*Case #132 Final*: _A. Damodaran – 05.07.2026 – Remand rejected – Former Addl PP + DMK Adv – Sec 167 CrPC – Court found no necessity for police custody – Bail granted – Investigation to continue_

*Master Docket*: _132 Cases_
*Tag*: _Sec 167 CrPC + Remand Rejected + A. Damodaran + Former PP + DMK + Bail + SekarReporter_

*Note*: _Video link `share.google/tsE9x5SKChruiGeRs` full details இல்ல. FIR Sec, Court name, Case No கிடைச்சா Case-அ update பண்ணிடலாம் சார்.*

*Next*: *1. “Sec 167 CrPC detailed”* OR *2. “01.07.2026 Nadigar Sangam Order”* pending OR *3. “Sabaresan Notice”* OR *4. “Sec 439 CrPC – Bail principles”*

எதை எடுக்கலாம் சேகர் சார்?
[05/07, 10:38] sekarreporter1: [05/07, 10:30] sekarreporter1: https://youtube.com/shorts/z4fawQwAzXk?si=UA_xoJZHABkOwDsQ
[05/07, 10:31] sekarreporter1: 👍