Vinothpandian: Supreme court: criminal appeal no 185 -186 of 2022 dated 7- 02- 2022 serious fraud investigation office vs Rahul modi : In a default bail case right conferred on accused under section 167 (2) CRPC 1973 cannot be exercised after charge – sheet submitted and cognizance taken [18/08, 15:13] Vinothpandian:

[18/08, 15:13] Vinothpandian: Supreme court: criminal appeal no 185 -186 of 2022 dated 7- 02- 2022 serious fraud investigation office vs Rahul modi : In a default bail case right conferred on accused under section 167 (2) CRPC 1973 cannot be exercised after charge – sheet submitted and cognizance taken
[18/08, 15:13] Vinothpandian: Supreme court: civil.appeal no 363 of 2022 dated 10- 02 – 2022 Bank of baroda vs M / S karwa trading company and another : In a SARFASI proceedings , unless and until borrower ready to deposit / pay entire amount payable together with all costs and expenses with secured creditor , borrower cannot be discharged from entire liability outstanding
[18/08, 15:13] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : criminal appeal no 248 -250 of 2015 dated 20-05-2022 manoj and others vs state of madhya pradesh : In a criminal trial public opinion neither an objective circumstance relating to crime , nor the criminal, and the courts must exercise judicial restraint and play a balancing role , ” Role of public prosecutor is intrinsically dedicated to conducting a fair trial and not for a ” thirst to reach the case in conviction ”
[19/08, 12:24] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : SLP ( crl ) no 1354 of 2022 dated 8-09-2022 : P dharmaraj vs shanmugam : court has to go slow even while exercising jurisdiction under section 482 CRPC or article 226 of constitution in matter of quashing of criminal proceedings on basis of settlement between parties
[19/08, 12:24] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : criminal appeal no 1834 of 2022 dated 21 / 10/ 2022 sumitha pradeep vs Arun kumar CK : custodial interrogation can be one of relevant aspects to be considered while deciding anticipatory bail application
[19/08, 12:24] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : SLP ( crl ) 1247 of 2022 dated 21 – 02 – 2022 Rajesh seth vs state of chattisgarh ; Indefinite adjournment in matter relating to anticipatory bail application after admitting it is detrimental to valuable right of a person
[20/08, 11:40] Vinothpandian: 2019 (5) CTC 914 : Goomo orbit corporate & leisure travels pvt ltd vs GI retail pvt ltd : In a plaint , party relying on misrepresentation , fraud , breach of trust wilful.default or any undue influence must plead all particulars including dates and items in a suit for defamation.
[20/08, 11:40] Vinothpandian: 2021 (4) CTC 481 : V kannaiyan and others vs district collector salem : Held once land acquistion quashed by the appropriate court no right vests in government or its officials to retain control in any form ( land acquisition act )
[20/08, 11:40] Vinothpandian: 2014 (2) crimes 80 : mangat Ram vs state of Haryana : failure of a married person to take his wife along with him to the place where he is working or posted would not amount to cruelty .
[21/08, 10:58] Vinothpandian: 2018 (16) SCC 408 : shafin jahan vs Asokan KM and others : Parental love cannot be allowed to fluster the right of choice of an adult in choosing a man to whom she gets married
[21/08, 10:58] Vinothpandian: 2004 (1) crimes 567 : Avon organics ltd vs Pioneer products ltd : The cheque issued without mentioning the amount for which it is drawn is not a cheque in the eye of law
[21/08, 10:58] Vinothpandian: 2014 (16) SCC 1 : Pooja Ravinder devidasani vs state of maharastra : To attract a case under sec 141 of the NI act a specific role must have been played by a director of the company for fastening vicarious liability
[21/08, 10:58] Vinothpandian: 2006 (1) KLT 131 : murlidharan vs sreeram investment ltd : delay in filing complaint under sec 138 NI act can be condoned only on the basis of affidavit filed by the complainant , affidavit of advocate is not sufficient