Vinothpandian: 2025 (5) CTC 789 : K Rangasamy vs K devaraj : when plaintiff has not proven financial wherewithal to extend loan , mere admission of defendants signature in promissory note not sufficient blank promissory note filled up by plaintiff , alleged transaction hit by fraud

[02/03, 11:10] Vinothpandian: 2025 (5) CTC 789 : K Rangasamy vs K devaraj : when plaintiff has not proven financial wherewithal to extend loan , mere admission of defendants signature in promissory note not sufficient blank promissory note filled up by plaintiff , alleged transaction hit by fraud ( NIAct 1881 section 118 )
[02/03, 11:10] Vinothpandian: 2025 (2) 652 SC : Parminder Singh vs honey goyal : In a motor vehicle tribunal with regard to disbursement of compensation after passing of award , insurance company to transfer award amount to bank account of claimant and intimation of compliance to be furnished to tribunal
[02/03, 11:10] Vinothpandian: 2025 (2) CTC 864 SC ; Om prakash gupta vs satish chandra : counsel who learns of party’s death , duty bound to inform court , stray or oblique mention of death without date or formal notice does not constitute sufficient compliance with rules ( order 22 rule 10 A CPC 1908 )
[02/03, 11:10] Vinothpandian: 2025 (6) CTC 98 : Delhi development authority vs corporation bank : Held by virtue of sec 29 of RDDBFI act , IT act and IT rules applicable to proceedings under RDDBFI act
[02/03, 11:10] Vinothpandian: 2025 (6) CTC 857 : Metrozone apartment owners association vs Ozone projects : Bar under section 79 RERA excludes civil court only from matters that RERA authorities are empowered to determine