Velyathirai case order
https://youtu.be/g_NVMxaGqCI
You may also like...
-
![Sekarreporter1: https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/madras-bar-association-moves-supreme-court-challenging-tribunals-reforms-ordinance-2021-172789 [4/19, 19:34] Sekarreporter1: The Madras Bar Association has filed a writ petition in the Supreme Court challenging the Tribunals Reforms (Rationalization and Conditions of Service) Ordinance 2021, to the extent it amends Sections 184 and 186 of the Finance Act 2017.](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Sekarreporter1: https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/madras-bar-association-moves-supreme-court-challenging-tribunals-reforms-ordinance-2021-172789 [4/19, 19:34] Sekarreporter1: The Madras Bar Association has filed a writ petition in the Supreme Court challenging the Tribunals Reforms (Rationalization and Conditions of Service) Ordinance 2021, to the extent it amends Sections 184 and 186 of the Finance Act 2017.
by Sekar Reporter · Published April 19, 2021
-
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN C.M.P.No.6514 of 2020 in Tr.C.M.P.No.942 of 2019 ——-It is very saddening to note that it is a shame on the part of an Advocate to refuse to vacate the premises, when a landlord requires it and the Advocates are referred to as gentleman in the preamble to Chapter-II of the Bar Council of India Rules under Section 49(1)(c) of the Act read with the proviso thereto. In the present case on hand, the petitioner / Tenant has proved himself to be a wicked, dishonest and unprincipled person. It is directed that the matter shall be handled only by Mr.C.K.Chandrasekar, learned counsel for Bar Council / R2 and he shall not be displaced by anyone from the Panel till a final decision is taken on the enquiry against the petitioner. As the time limit is fixed under the Advocates Act, the Bar Council must ensure that the papers are not misplaced, so as to later contend that the time has already been over and no action can be taken against the petitioner herein. Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to MHAA, MBA and Women Lawyers’ Association to inform the members of the respective Associations that they should not defend a dishonest Tenant, who happens to be a deceitful Advocate, like the petitioner herein, who is not a gentleman, in order to safeguard the reputation of this profession. An Advocate, who happens to be a tenant, should be a gentleman and shall vacate the premises within 30 days, if request is made by the landlord. If that happens, a Lawyer will get a house on rent even without a written agreement. Some of the Advocates are now-a-days looked at as Rowdies and third rate criminals by public by the conduct of similar to the one of the tenant in this case. It is painful to say that many of the Advocates are involved in the land grabbing and if the antecedent of the petitioner / S.VAIDYANATHAN,J., jrs/ar tenant is verified, he may also be one of the land grabbers. The tenant has scant regard for the orders of the Court and he has portrayed sadistic attitude.
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 12, 2021
-
The Madras High Court ruled that a student who attains benchmark disability of 40 percent during the course of study is entitled to tuition fee waiver, notwithstanding the fact that the student was not admitted under the PwD quota at the time of admission.
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 24, 2026