Top 5 tips by chandru law acadamy for judicial exam students
https://youtu.be/jU8hxPKm2lk
![The appeal is, therefore, allowed. The impugned judgment and order is set aside. There shall be no order as to costs. ……………………………………,J. [INDIRA BANERJEE] ……………………………………,J. [V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN] NEW DELHI; JULY 19, 2022.](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1604511679936884738?t=QQbwqbkxLm_CeB7sZV4foA&s=08 [12/18, 21:49] sekarreporter1: *GLIMPSE OF A LATEST VERDICT* *M. Fredrick Monika Vs. The Inspector General of Registration & 2 Ors.* W.P. No. 32582 of 2022 Dated: 05.12.2022 *HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBRAMANIAN* dismissed the Writ Petition in the matter relating to *“Marriage – Solemnized – Valid”*, and further observed and held as follows:
- Previous story 2.It is the case of the petitioner that her marriage with the 3rd respondent was solemnized on 12.10.2022 without her consent in the 2nd respondent Church therefore, the same should not be registered. I do not think such a mandamus could be issued. Once the marriage is solemnized, de hors registration, is by itself valid. It can be dissolved only by a decree of Court. The Registration by itself does not add to the sanctity of the marriage, which according to the petitioner was done without her consent. 3.Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioner to approach the Civil Court or the appropriate forum seeking a declaration that the marriage is invalid. No costs. 05.12.2022 kkn Internet:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. KKN To:- 1.The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai – 28. W.P.No.32582 of 2022 05.12.2022. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Pandian For Respondents : Mr.M.Muthusamy Government Advocate for R1 O R D E R The prayer in the Writ Petition reads as follows:directing the 1st respondent not to register the marriage which was solemnized on 12.11.2022 before the 2nd respondent church without the petitioner’s consent to the 3rd respondent by considering the petitioner’s representation dated 28.10.2022 and dispose of the same within the time limit that may be stipulated.
Recent Posts
- Not to harash senthil balaji pettion dismissed judge Ilanthiriyan/ state pp john satgya and Senior NR Elango
- appellant is granted liberty to establish his claims for professional fees and agitate his grievances before a competent civil court or appropriate forum. If the appellant chooses to file a civil suit, the time spent bona fide prosecuting the writ petition and this writ appeal shall be excluded for the purpose of computing limitation. There shall be no order as to costs. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J)
- The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court on Tuesday (July 21) directed the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (TNEB) authorities to restore the electricity connection to a petitioner’s shop immediately and granted an interim injunction restraining the authorities from evicting him without following due process of law.
- Trustee moves Madras high court seeking scheme for Vels Trust
- Majestrate power /HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI CRL.RC.(MD)No.577 of 2026 Kannan Baba …. Petitioner Vs. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by the Inspector of Police,
More
Recent Posts
- Not to harash senthil balaji pettion dismissed judge Ilanthiriyan/ state pp john satgya and Senior NR Elango
- appellant is granted liberty to establish his claims for professional fees and agitate his grievances before a competent civil court or appropriate forum. If the appellant chooses to file a civil suit, the time spent bona fide prosecuting the writ petition and this writ appeal shall be excluded for the purpose of computing limitation. There shall be no order as to costs. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J)
- The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court on Tuesday (July 21) directed the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (TNEB) authorities to restore the electricity connection to a petitioner’s shop immediately and granted an interim injunction restraining the authorities from evicting him without following due process of law.
- Trustee moves Madras high court seeking scheme for Vels Trust
- Majestrate power /HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI CRL.RC.(MD)No.577 of 2026 Kannan Baba …. Petitioner Vs. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by the Inspector of Police,