You may also like...
-
Justice Pugalendhi asked why an independent special team with experts with knowledge in cyber-security cannot be constituted to carry out the investigation. However, Narayanan said that such an investigation is required only when a prima facie is established in the case. The court sought the counsels to make their written submissions and adjourned the plea to February 18.
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 11, 2021
-
Madras HC judges n kirubakatan j velumani jrefuses to suspend life sentence of a teacher, says he behaved like a monster
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 3, 2020
-
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.Nos.4303 and 4304 of 2008 M/s.Tirupur Sree Annapoorna, For Petitioner : Mrs.R.Hemalatha For R1 : Tribunal For R2 & R3 : Mr.V.Prashanth Kiran Govt. Advocate ***** C O M M O N O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by S.VAIDYANATHAN,J.,) we are of the view that there is no perversity in the findings of the Tribunal, warranting interference by this Court. In the result, these Writ Petitions are dismissed. No costs. (S.V.N.J.,) (C.S.N.J.,)
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 1, 2023