Sekarreporter- Republic Day function at High Court 2020
Follow:
- Next story Sekarreporter- Republic Day function at High Court 2020 govt advts photos
- Previous story Family Pension to 2nd wife: Here’s why Madras High Court allowedCiting a Supreme Court judgment, Justice Anand Venkatesh allowed her petition and said “… this court has to necessarily lean towards the presumption of marriage rather than branding the petitioner as a concubine.”
Recent Posts
- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI W.P.No.11432 of 2026 and W.M.P. No.12454 of 2026 Agambal Meiyappan ..Petitioner Vs 1. The Joint Secretary (Foreigners Division) Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India Jaisalmer House, 26 Mansingh Road New Delhi 110011. 2. The Chief Immigration Officer / FRRO No.26 Shastri Bhavan Annexe, Haddows Road Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 006. 3. The Commissioner Rehabilitation and Welfare of Non
- HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P. NO. 5647 OF 2026 AND W.M.P. NOS. 6129 & 6132 OF 2026 SRICO Projects Pvt. Ltd. Rep. by its Managing Director Mr. Mechineni Srinivasa Rao .. Petitioner – Vs – The Deputy Chief Engineer (Construction) Southern Railway
- HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR Crl.O.P.No.9848 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.Nos.7042 & 7043 of 2026 Abdul Khader Mohammed Farook (M/56), S/o.Abdul Khader, No.59, M.K.N.Road, Guindy, Chennai-600032. PAN: AAHPF4076K. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Corporate Circle-1[1], Numgambakkam, … Petitioner Chennai-600034. … Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to call for the records relating to E.O.C.C.No.133 of 2019 pending on the file of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (Economic Offences), Egmore, Chennai and quash the same. For Petitioner : Ms.N.Lavanya For Respondent : Ms.M.Sheela, Senior Standing Counsel (Income Tax) and Mr.H.Siddarth, Junior Standing Counsel (Income Tax) ORDER The petitioner/accused facing trial for offence under Section 276C(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961 before the learned Additional Chief
- THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2193 /2026 [@ SLP [CRL.] NO.18828/2025] MOHAN KARTHIK & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ANR. Respondent(s) O R D E R Leave granted. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellants and the learned Senior counsel appearing for the respondents.
- sekarreporter1: https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/parameters-for-sections-1563-200-crpc-are-different-supreme-court-sets-aside-hc-order-allowing-second-1563-plea-532935 [05/05, 15:23] sekarreporter1: The Supreme Court has held that the parameters governing the invocation of Sections 156(3) and 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 operate in distinct fields, setting aside a High Court order that had
More
Recent Posts
- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI W.P.No.11432 of 2026 and W.M.P. No.12454 of 2026 Agambal Meiyappan ..Petitioner Vs 1. The Joint Secretary (Foreigners Division) Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India Jaisalmer House, 26 Mansingh Road New Delhi 110011. 2. The Chief Immigration Officer / FRRO No.26 Shastri Bhavan Annexe, Haddows Road Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 006. 3. The Commissioner Rehabilitation and Welfare of Non
- HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P. NO. 5647 OF 2026 AND W.M.P. NOS. 6129 & 6132 OF 2026 SRICO Projects Pvt. Ltd. Rep. by its Managing Director Mr. Mechineni Srinivasa Rao .. Petitioner – Vs – The Deputy Chief Engineer (Construction) Southern Railway
- HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR Crl.O.P.No.9848 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.Nos.7042 & 7043 of 2026 Abdul Khader Mohammed Farook (M/56), S/o.Abdul Khader, No.59, M.K.N.Road, Guindy, Chennai-600032. PAN: AAHPF4076K. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Corporate Circle-1[1], Numgambakkam, … Petitioner Chennai-600034. … Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to call for the records relating to E.O.C.C.No.133 of 2019 pending on the file of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (Economic Offences), Egmore, Chennai and quash the same. For Petitioner : Ms.N.Lavanya For Respondent : Ms.M.Sheela, Senior Standing Counsel (Income Tax) and Mr.H.Siddarth, Junior Standing Counsel (Income Tax) ORDER The petitioner/accused facing trial for offence under Section 276C(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961 before the learned Additional Chief
- THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2193 /2026 [@ SLP [CRL.] NO.18828/2025] MOHAN KARTHIK & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ANR. Respondent(s) O R D E R Leave granted. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellants and the learned Senior counsel appearing for the respondents.
- sekarreporter1: https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/parameters-for-sections-1563-200-crpc-are-different-supreme-court-sets-aside-hc-order-allowing-second-1563-plea-532935 [05/05, 15:23] sekarreporter1: The Supreme Court has held that the parameters governing the invocation of Sections 156(3) and 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 operate in distinct fields, setting aside a High Court order that had