Rs 20 lakhs fine to real estate company
https://youtu.be/Sg5KCCgSu_M
![Suo Motu Crl. Contempt Petition No.929 of 2020 P.N.PRAKASH, J. AND V.SIVAGNANAM, J. O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by P.N.PRAKASH, J.] One Ms.R.Poornima (District Judge cadre), is functioning as Registrar (Vigilance) of this Court for the last two and a half years. She has been acting under the direct supervision of the Vigilance Committee of the High Court and under the nose of the Hon’ble Chief Justice. It is common knowledge that in the last two and a half years, the Vigilance Committee has been taking serious action against delinquent judicial officers and staff members, which has earned for Ms.R.Poornima, the wrath of vested interests, who are yearning for her scalp.](https://www.sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story 14.3.’21, PEARLS OF WISDOM :* “In the morning, before Courts begin their proceedings everyday, it is customary for both lawyers and Judges to bow. They bow not to each other but to the Goddess of Justice. In their hurry resulting from concentration on different cases which are being tried from day to day,
- Previous story Full order BEFORE THE TAMIL NADU REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY (TNRERA) (Tamil Nadu, Andaman & Nicobar Islands) at Egmore, Chennai – 600 008 [Under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016] C.No.76 of 2020 10th day of March, 2021 Coram : Thiru K. Gnanadesikan, I.A.S.(Retired), Chairperson Er. S. Manohar, Member Adv. V. Jeyakumar, Member –+-Therefore, this Authority imposes a penalty of Rupees Ten Lakhs only on the Respondent Promoters to be paid jointly before 31.03.2021 and shall immediately remove all factual misrepresentations which are inconsistent with the details of the projects registered with this Authority from all the websites of the Respondent Promoter group immediately. 24. With these directions this complaint is disposed of. Sd/-… 10.03.2021 Sd/-… 10.03.2021 Sd/-… 10.03.2021 MEMBER (M), TNRERA MEMBER(J), TNRERA CHAIRPERSON, TNRERA
Recent Posts
- Mhc news
- “We are, therefore, inclined to set aside the order of the First Appellate Authority and direct the First Appellate Authority to treat the delay as condoned, and examine and pass orders on merits. Writ appeal stands allowed. There will be no order as to costs.” https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/mr-k-r-shriram-chief-justice-and-mr-justice-mohammed-shaffiqmr-justice-mohammed-shaffiq/#:~:text=We%20are%2C%20therefore,as%20to%20costs.
- கே.சந்துரு மேனாள் நீதிபதி சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் நீதிபதி டாக்டர் மரியா கிளீட் அளித்துள்ள பரபரப்பான தீர்ப்பு
- MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR A.S.No.586 of 2025 and CMP.No.10580 of 2025 Prema … Appellant
- நீதிபதி திரு சத்யநாராயண பிரசாத் அவர்கள் முன்னிலையில் விசாரணைக்கு வந்தது. மனுதாரர் மற்றும் சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்ற மூத்த வழக்கறிஞர் துரைசாமியின் சார்பில், வழக்கறிஞர் வி. இளங்கோவன் ஆஜரானார். அரசு
More
Recent Posts
- Mhc news
- “We are, therefore, inclined to set aside the order of the First Appellate Authority and direct the First Appellate Authority to treat the delay as condoned, and examine and pass orders on merits. Writ appeal stands allowed. There will be no order as to costs.” https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/mr-k-r-shriram-chief-justice-and-mr-justice-mohammed-shaffiqmr-justice-mohammed-shaffiq/#:~:text=We%20are%2C%20therefore,as%20to%20costs.
- கே.சந்துரு மேனாள் நீதிபதி சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் நீதிபதி டாக்டர் மரியா கிளீட் அளித்துள்ள பரபரப்பான தீர்ப்பு
- MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR A.S.No.586 of 2025 and CMP.No.10580 of 2025 Prema … Appellant
- நீதிபதி திரு சத்யநாராயண பிரசாத் அவர்கள் முன்னிலையில் விசாரணைக்கு வந்தது. மனுதாரர் மற்றும் சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்ற மூத்த வழக்கறிஞர் துரைசாமியின் சார்பில், வழக்கறிஞர் வி. இளங்கோவன் ஆஜரானார். அரசு
