Follow:
- Next story Physical court notification mhc
- Previous story Court physical hearing tv news video
Recent Posts
- PLAINT LIFELINE OF LITIGATION
- DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: WHETHER THE SECOND APPEAL UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC IS MAINTAINABLE FROM THE APPELLAT’S COURT DECREE OF REVERSING THE REJECTION OF PLAINT DECREE:-
- The Supreme Court on Friday reserved its judgment on an appeal challenging the Madras High Court’s decision that downloading and possessing child pornography is not a criminal offence.
- Minister sekar babu pa case full order / mhc/ Learned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 and 2 submits that the third respondent is not on election duty and if the third respondent, being a government servant, engages in acts which are not in consonance with the Tamil Nadu Government Servants’ Conduct Rules, 1973, then it is for the employer to take action. He further submits that respondents 1 and 2 would take necessaryaction on the basis of the complaint received from the petitioner.In view of the said statement, the writ petition is disposed of.There shall be no order as to costs.(S.V.G., CJ.) (J.S.N.P., J.)18.04.2024Index : Yes/NoNeutral Citation : Yes/NosasiTo:1.The Election Commissioner,Election Commission of India, Nivachan Bhavan, New Delhi.2.The Chief Electoral Officer,Government of Tamilnadu,Secretariat,Chennai-600 009. THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICEAND J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD,J.(sasi)
- Tn medium qouta case wp allowed full order of THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
More
Recent Posts
- PLAINT LIFELINE OF LITIGATION
- DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: WHETHER THE SECOND APPEAL UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC IS MAINTAINABLE FROM THE APPELLAT’S COURT DECREE OF REVERSING THE REJECTION OF PLAINT DECREE:-
- The Supreme Court on Friday reserved its judgment on an appeal challenging the Madras High Court’s decision that downloading and possessing child pornography is not a criminal offence.
- Minister sekar babu pa case full order / mhc/ Learned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 and 2 submits that the third respondent is not on election duty and if the third respondent, being a government servant, engages in acts which are not in consonance with the Tamil Nadu Government Servants’ Conduct Rules, 1973, then it is for the employer to take action. He further submits that respondents 1 and 2 would take necessaryaction on the basis of the complaint received from the petitioner.In view of the said statement, the writ petition is disposed of.There shall be no order as to costs.(S.V.G., CJ.) (J.S.N.P., J.)18.04.2024Index : Yes/NoNeutral Citation : Yes/NosasiTo:1.The Election Commissioner,Election Commission of India, Nivachan Bhavan, New Delhi.2.The Chief Electoral Officer,Government of Tamilnadu,Secretariat,Chennai-600 009. THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICEAND J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD,J.(sasi)
- Tn medium qouta case wp allowed full order of THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY