SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

W.P.Nos.10666 of 2019 etc. W.P.Nos.10666 of 2019 and 2127 of 2021 THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE and P.D.AUDIKESAVALU,J. (Order of the Court was made by the Hon’ble Chief Justice) The matter had been adjourned

Uncategorized

 by · Published September 8, 2021

W.P.Nos.10666 of 2019 etc. W.P.Nos.10666 of 2019 and 2127 of 2021 THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE and P.D.AUDIKESAVALU,J. (Order of the Court was made by the Hon’ble Chief Justice) The matter had been adjourned

W.P.Nos.10666 of 2019 etc. W.P.Nos.10666 of 2019 and 2127 of 2021 THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE and P.D.AUDIKESAVALU,J. (Order of the Court was made by the Hon’ble Chief Justice) The matter had been adjourned for...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
[9/8, 18:24] Durai Arun: தமிழ் நாட்டின் ஒட்டுமொத்த வழக்கறிஞர்களின் பல்வேறு கோரிக்கைகளை சட்டம் மற்றும் நீதித்துறை மானிய கோரிக்கை மீதான விவாதத்தின் போது சட்டமன்றத்தில் எடுத்து பேசிய எழும்பூர் சட்டமன்ற உறுப்பினர் அண்ணன் இ.பரந்தாமன் அவர்களுக்கு நன்றி பாராட்டுகிறோம். [9/8, 18:32] Sekarreporter: 🙏🙏

Uncategorized

 by · Published September 8, 2021

[9/8, 18:24] Durai Arun: தமிழ் நாட்டின் ஒட்டுமொத்த வழக்கறிஞர்களின் பல்வேறு கோரிக்கைகளை சட்டம் மற்றும் நீதித்துறை மானிய கோரிக்கை மீதான விவாதத்தின் போது சட்டமன்றத்தில் எடுத்து பேசிய எழும்பூர் சட்டமன்ற உறுப்பினர் அண்ணன் இ.பரந்தாமன் அவர்களுக்கு நன்றி பாராட்டுகிறோம். [9/8, 18:32] Sekarreporter: 🙏🙏

[9/8, 18:24] Durai Arun: தமிழ் நாட்டின் ஒட்டுமொத்த வழக்கறிஞர்களின் பல்வேறு கோரிக்கைகளை சட்டம் மற்றும் நீதித்துறை மானிய கோரிக்கை மீதான விவாதத்தின் போது சட்டமன்றத்தில் எடுத்து பேசிய எழும்பூர் சட்டமன்ற உறுப்பினர் அண்ணன் இ.பரந்தாமன் அவர்களுக்கு நன்றி பாராட்டுகிறோம். [9/8, 18:32] Sekarreporter: 🙏🙏

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
A division bench of the Madras High Court has stayed the operation of an order of a single judge, which among other things, had directed the State government to constitute a taxation committee in each district, headed by the respective Collectors in the matter of collection of property tax assessment and collection.

Uncategorized

 by · Published September 8, 2021

A division bench of the Madras High Court has stayed the operation of an order of a single judge, which among other things, had directed the State government to constitute a taxation committee in each district, headed by the respective Collectors in the matter of collection of property tax assessment and collection.

A division bench of the Madras High Court has stayed the operation of an order of a single judge, which among other things, had directed the State government to constitute a taxation committee in...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
W.A.No.2284 of 2021 W.A.No.2284 of 2021 and C.M.P.No.14503 of 2021 T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J. and SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J. [Order of the Court was made by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.] Heard Mr.K.Doraisamy, learned Senior Counsel for the appellant. 2.The issue involved in the writ petition filed by the appellant was whether retrospective revision of Property Tax could be done and Surcharge can also be demanded on such retrospectively revised Property Tax. –W.A.No.2284 of 2021 dismissed the writ petition largely on the ground that there is large scale non-collection of Property Tax across the State and that the High Court, being the custodian of the Constitution of India, is obligated to initiate appropriate action to ensure that the Constitutional principles and mandates are being followed by the Executives and all concerned, scrupulously. After making several other observations, the Court has dismissed the writ petition and issued various directions as contained in Para No.31 of the impugned order. 5.Prima facie, we are of the view that the directions contained in Para No.31 (ii) to (vi) are beyond the scope of the writ petition and in a writ petition, not in the nature of Public Interest Litigation, the question would be whether the Writ Court can issue such directions. Therefore, we are of the view that the appellant has made out a prima facie case for entertaining this Writ Appeal. 6.Accordingly, this Writ Appeal is admitted. The appellant had the benefit of order of interim stay during the pendency of the writ petition. Hence, there shall be an order of interim stay.-

Uncategorized

 by · Published September 8, 2021

W.A.No.2284 of 2021 W.A.No.2284 of 2021 and C.M.P.No.14503 of 2021 T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J. and SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J. [Order of the Court was made by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.] Heard Mr.K.Doraisamy, learned Senior Counsel for the appellant. 2.The issue involved in the writ petition filed by the appellant was whether retrospective revision of Property Tax could be done and Surcharge can also be demanded on such retrospectively revised Property Tax. –W.A.No.2284 of 2021 dismissed the writ petition largely on the ground that there is large scale non-collection of Property Tax across the State and that the High Court, being the custodian of the Constitution of India, is obligated to initiate appropriate action to ensure that the Constitutional principles and mandates are being followed by the Executives and all concerned, scrupulously. After making several other observations, the Court has dismissed the writ petition and issued various directions as contained in Para No.31 of the impugned order. 5.Prima facie, we are of the view that the directions contained in Para No.31 (ii) to (vi) are beyond the scope of the writ petition and in a writ petition, not in the nature of Public Interest Litigation, the question would be whether the Writ Court can issue such directions. Therefore, we are of the view that the appellant has made out a prima facie case for entertaining this Writ Appeal. 6.Accordingly, this Writ Appeal is admitted. The appellant had the benefit of order of interim stay during the pendency of the writ petition. Hence, there shall be an order of interim stay.-

[9/8, 17:22] Sekarreporter: W.A.No.2284 of 2021 W.A.No.2284 of 2021 and C.M.P.No.14503 of 2021 T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J. and SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J. [Order of the Court was made by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.] Heard Mr.K.Doraisamy, learned...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published September 8, 2021

Tax order THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.Nos.16595 to 16598 of 2008 And M.P.Nos.1, 1, 1 and 1 of 2008 M/s Radel Electronics Pvt. Ltd. Repres –For Petitioner in all WPs : Ms.Anuradha P.M. For Respondents in all WPs: Mr.V. Nanmaran, Government Advocate. C O M M O N O R D E R by its Manager,——-This being the scope of the order impugned, this Court do not find any merit on the contentions raised on behalf of the petitioner. Further, the writ petitions are filed challenging the Notice. No writ against the notice is to be entertained in a routine manner. If at all the petitioner is aggrieved, they are bound to file their objections along with the documents and the evidences. 33. For all these reasons the writ petitions are devoid of merits and stand dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 03-09-2021 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.Nos.16595 to 16598 of 2008 And M.P.Nos.1, 1, 1 and 1 of 2008 M/s Radel Electronics Pvt. Ltd....

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version