Mhc gp office pongal photos
You may also like...
-
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.R. SWAMINATHAN W.P. (MD) No.10641 of 2020 and W.M.P (MD) Nos.9368 to 9371 of 2020 & 4281 of 2021 Arulmigu Meenakshi Sundareshwarar Temple, Madurai through its Joint Commissioner/ Executive Officer … Petitioner full For Petitioner : Mr.S.Manohar For R1 and R2 : Mr.K.S.Selva Ganesan Additional Government Pleader For R3 : Mr.T.Joseph Jayakumar R4 : Died For R5 : Mr.R.Murali For R6 : Mr.S.Madhavan for Mr.Arun Srivatsava O R D E R
by Sekar Reporter · Published October 17, 2022
-
Former minister sp velumani case full order. THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.N. PRAKASH and THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RMT. TEEKAA RAMAN W.P. No.34845 of 2018 and Crl.O.P. Nos.23428 of 2018 and 21564 and 21565 of 2022 and connected Miscellaneous Petitions W.P. No.34845 of 2018 Arappor Iyakkam COMMON ORDER P.N. PRAKASH, J. In view of the commonality of the facts, the decision in the four cases at hand, viz., W.P. No.34845 of 2018 and Crl.O.P. Nos.23428 of 2018 and 21564 and 21565 of 2022, will be governed by this common order.
by Sekar Reporter · Published November 30, 2022
-
Judiciary not Jesus to carry the cross for authorities’ sins: HC Taking a serious view of the delay, Justice N Seshasayee observed that only because of such unjustifiable delays caused by authorities, courts are burdened with lakhs of litigations. Published: 13th January 2021 05:51 AM | Last Updated: 13th January 2021 05:51 AM | A+A A- Madras High Court Madras High Court (File photo | EPS) By Express News Service CHENNAI: Censuring the Dharmapuri and Perambalur district administration for a 20-year delay in providing land records awaiting mutation, the Madras High Court observed that the judiciary is not Jesus Christ to carry the cross for the sins committed by the authorities. The court also ordered Rs 1 lakh and Rs 50,000 as compensation for the two petitioners, respectively, who were made to run from pillar to post for the past 20 years. Taking a serious view of the delay, Justice N Seshasayee observed that only because of such unjustifiable delays caused by authorities, courts are burdened with lakhs of litigations. The issue pertains to the petitions moved by Rathinam and Jayalakshmi seeking direction to the district administration to re-mutate records of the land owned by them. According to Rathinam, she owned about four acres of land at Virappanayakkampatti, Harur village, Dharmapuri. The land was notified for acquisition under the Land Acquisition Act, 1984, by the Tamil Nadu government in 1987. In 1988, a GO was issued for acquisition of the land. The same was challenged by the petitioner in the high court. Advertisement The judge, recording the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioners, ordered SP Karthikaa, Dharmapuri collector and P Sri Venkada Priya, Perambalur collector, who were summoned during the hearing, to come up with a viable solution for such issues which are rampant across the State. It was also noted that no appeal was made by the State against the HC order, or fresh acquisition notification was issued. Justice N Seshasayee observed .
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 13, 2021
