Mhc cj ap shahi function video -judges sivananam j , jagathees chandra j ,pushpa sathyanarayanan j , inaguration of virutual biomatric system
Follow:
- Next story The ESI corporation memorandum dt 6/8/2020 the bond conditions was modified as five year to one year. The writ petitioners completed their one year service in esi hospital. Hence the above 13 writ petitioners filed withdrawal petition. The writ petitions came before justice Anand Venkatesh on 25th sep
- Previous story Mr. R. Subramanian, J.full orderCompulsory service – Merely because, petitioners, had secured a certain percentage of marks, were allotted to the third respondent College in the general counselling held by the State Government, they do not form a separate class.
Recent Posts
- #MadrasHighCourt Chief Justice’s Bench adjourns to August 20, 2026 a batch of cases filed by Confederation of Real Estate Associations of India (CREDAI)-Chennai chapter and other individual realtors challenging a ban imposed by the National Green Tribunal (NGT) on new constructions on 8,584.44 acres of land located within a distance of 1 km around the boundaries of Pallikaranai marsh land, a Ramsar site. Judges say they may set aside the blanket ban imposed by NGT but fear that it should not lead to mushrooming of constructions around the wetland. They direct Tamil Nadu State Wetland Authority to come up with some suggestions to balance the need to protect the environment and also allow infrastructure development. They want to know in which areas the construction ban could be imposed to protect the sources of water to the wetland and where the ban could be lifted as an interim measure until the final ‘zone of influence’ is determined. @THChennai Backgrounder👇 thehindu.com/news/national/…
- Govt Advocates Appointment*: _Appointments made on basis of merit and qualification, without party bias. “This is a people’s government”_ minister Nirmal kumar
- Stay order/THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN WP Crl. Nos.1928 and 1931 of 2026 and WPMP Crl. Nos.692, 694, 696 and 698 of 2026 1. Sethuraj
- Udayanithi arrest case order /Recording the above submissions made by the learned Advocate General, the respondent is directed to release the petitioner, after questioning him, pursuant to the registration of the FIR in Crime No. 287 of 2026, today itself. The petitioner is also directed to co-operate with the respondent in the investigation as and when required. 8. With the above direction, the Criminal Original Petition is ordered.
- Former Aag Ravinthiren argued on behalf pf DK case / for police state argued Madras HC judge ilanthiriyan /directs Tamil Nadu Police to respond on denial of permission for NEET protest bike rally. Matter adjourned to 11.08.2026*
More
Recent Posts
- #MadrasHighCourt Chief Justice’s Bench adjourns to August 20, 2026 a batch of cases filed by Confederation of Real Estate Associations of India (CREDAI)-Chennai chapter and other individual realtors challenging a ban imposed by the National Green Tribunal (NGT) on new constructions on 8,584.44 acres of land located within a distance of 1 km around the boundaries of Pallikaranai marsh land, a Ramsar site. Judges say they may set aside the blanket ban imposed by NGT but fear that it should not lead to mushrooming of constructions around the wetland. They direct Tamil Nadu State Wetland Authority to come up with some suggestions to balance the need to protect the environment and also allow infrastructure development. They want to know in which areas the construction ban could be imposed to protect the sources of water to the wetland and where the ban could be lifted as an interim measure until the final ‘zone of influence’ is determined. @THChennai Backgrounder👇 thehindu.com/news/national/…
- Govt Advocates Appointment*: _Appointments made on basis of merit and qualification, without party bias. “This is a people’s government”_ minister Nirmal kumar
- Stay order/THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN WP Crl. Nos.1928 and 1931 of 2026 and WPMP Crl. Nos.692, 694, 696 and 698 of 2026 1. Sethuraj
- Udayanithi arrest case order /Recording the above submissions made by the learned Advocate General, the respondent is directed to release the petitioner, after questioning him, pursuant to the registration of the FIR in Crime No. 287 of 2026, today itself. The petitioner is also directed to co-operate with the respondent in the investigation as and when required. 8. With the above direction, the Criminal Original Petition is ordered.
- Former Aag Ravinthiren argued on behalf pf DK case / for police state argued Madras HC judge ilanthiriyan /directs Tamil Nadu Police to respond on denial of permission for NEET protest bike rally. Matter adjourned to 11.08.2026*