MBC category reveals that the candidate in serial number 5, V.Jayagurunathan had secured 122, which is the cut-off. The candidates thereafter are women candidates in that category. 28. In light of the detailed discussion as above, this writ petition has no merit and is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also dismissed. (A.S.M.,J) (G.A.M.,J) 03.1

[12/06, 07:23] sekarreporter1: W.P.No.32840 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 03.10.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH
and
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN
W.P.No.32840 of 2017
and W.M.P.No.36188 of 2017
P.Siranjeevi … Petitioner
Vs
1. Union of India rep. By the
Govt. of Puducherry through the
Inspector General of Police,
Police Department, Puducherry.
2. The Superintendent of Police (HQ),
Police Department,
Puducherry.
3. K.Priya
4. M.Saranya
5. R.Agalya
6. S.Sathya
7. A.Shanmuga Sathya
8. The Registrar,
Central Administrative Tribunal,
Madras Bench, Chennai. .
[12/06, 07:23] sekarreporter1: ondents have averred in paragraph 7 of their Reply statement
dated Nil, February, 2013 before the Tribunal that the cut-off marks for male
candidates in MBC category is 122 out of 200. The petitioner had secured only 111
marks (44 in paper 1 and 76 in paper 2). It is hence that the petitioner stood
eliminated from selection in that category. A perusal of the list of candidates in
MBC category reveals that the candidate in serial number 5, V.Jayagurunathan had
secured 122, which is the cut-off. The candidates thereafter are women candidates in
that category.
28. In light of the detailed discussion as above, this writ petition has no merit
and is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also
dismissed.
(A.S.M.,J) (G.A.M.,J)
03.1