You may also like...
-
6/21, 12:12] Sekarreporter: https://youtu.be/WVotZ3Yr8FI [6/21, 12:22] Sekarreporter: [6/21, 11:33] Sekarreporter: Advocate V. Suresh, representing Arappor Iyakkam, seeks an adjournment since he wants to argue the case before physical court. [6/21, 11:33] Sekarreporter: Senior
by Sekar Reporter · Published June 21, 2021
-
Judicial Magistrate I, Pudukottai, is set aside. The Judicial Magistrate I, Pudukottai shall receive the xerox copy of the original cheque in question as a secondary evidence on record, expedite the trial and conclude the same, in accordance with law, as expeditously as possible. There is no order as to costs. 16.09.2025 Index:Yes/No Web:Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking Neutral Citation Srcm To 1. The Judicial Magistrate I, Pudukottai SHAMIM AHMED, J. Srcm Crl.RC(MD)No.662 of 2025 16.09.2025
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 24, 2025
-
which it was held that a Judge can differ with the view taken by another Judge on an issue, provided the parties to the lis, who happen to be the parties in the earlier round of litigation that has already attained finality, should not be one and the same. THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.No.6071 of 2021 The Secretary, Hindu Primary School,
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 22, 2021